Re: Langevin's paradox again

Den 16.07.2024 20:56, skrev Richard Hachel:

Le 16/07/2024 à 20:28, "Paul.B.Andersen" a écrit :

>
Den 16.07.2024 15:25, skrev Richard Hachel:

. .
They will still be if we ask Terrence's own time between the two crossings.
Tr=To.sqrt(1-Vo²/c²)=24/9 years (or 8/3)
. .
Hence Tr=24/9 years for her too (or 8/3).
. .
 

So your theory predicts that Stella and Terrence ages equally.
>
According to SR Stella's proper time is τₛ ≈ 2.19722 years.
>
So "the travelling twin" ages less than the "stay at home twin".
>
The ageing of the twins in the "twin paradox" is experimentally verified to be as predicted by SR.
>
Your theory is falsified.

 This is what I keep repeating to relativistic physicists, who can read what I write on usenet (but I don't think they are interested).

Right.
I am not interested.
You have answered my question and showed that the predictions
of your "theory" are different from the predictions of SR.
I am not interested in your obviously inconsistent
theory which give predictions which are not in accordance
with reality.
--
Paul
https://paulba.no/