Re: the notion of counter-intuitiveness in relativistic physics

Le 08/08/2024 à 13:20, M.D. Richard "Hachel" Lengrand a écrit :

Le 08/08/2024 à 13:06, Python a écrit :
 

Moreover you are lying: people are not objecting to your fantasies
by only saying that it is not what SR says (which is nevertheless
a perfectly valid objection) but by pointing out fallacies and
contradictions in your own words.

 You lies, Jean-Pierre Messager, you lies.
 "Mais tu sais que tu mens".
 You are the one who is lying by claiming that people criticize what I say because it is fantasy.
Not at all, it is generally enough to read a little of an author to know or sense whether it is fantasy or not.
No, no, no, that is not it at all: if people criticize, it is because it does not go in the direction of their convictions or their teachings, period.

You are highly delusional Richard. It takes only about half a page to
prove that your claims about accelerated frames of reference are:
- logically unsound (invoking tautologies as conditions, claiming
   that a frame dependent property implies a frame independent one)
- contradicting previous claims you had on the twin paradox
- contradicting the principle of Relativity
Nothing there is invoking SR in any ways. Your lie is exposed,
again.
You have a psychotic mental bloc (in addition to be a complete
idiot) that prevent you to even consider that something you pull
out of you a** with no justification at all can be wrong.
This is called "arrognorance". On top of that you have no intellectual
integrity and you are a pathological liar. Just like your buddy Donald
J. Trump.