Re: A short proof of the inconsistency of [SR]

Le 30/08/2024 à 16:28, Maciej Wozniak a écrit :

W dniu 30.08.2024 o 16:00, Python pisze:

Le 30/08/2024 à 15:57, Maciej Wozniak a écrit :

[boring nonsense]

>
Maciej, did it come to your mind that your "argument" for the
inconsistency of SR is soooo damned simple that if it were
sound it would have been pointed out for ages by other people
than you? If not by scientists (i.e. for you "member of the
cult"), by other relativity deniers.

 Well, it is  so damned simple and it wasn't pointed
out, [...] - so your "logic is as worthless
as always.
 Of course, it's a bit amazing that all physicists
(and wannabe physicists as well) are so lost in
their pathetic "Laws of Nature!!!!!" delusions
that they're unable to make such a simple conclusion
from a basic  definition they have.

So all of human beings (at least the part that had thoughts
about Relativity) for more than a century is stupid and lost BUT a
single individual, pretending to be an "information engineer" (whatever
that means :-) ).
Very, very realistic :-D
Oh, and no, when it comes to SR the definition of a second is
definitely not something we "have" or even need.

Still, that's a fact, and I'm not going to fight them.

Well, you are here (at least). With very very poor results.

poor stinker

Nice signature Maciej. Unfortunately you put it in the middle
of your post.