Re: Steel Man of Einstein & Relativity.

Den 13.09.2024 08:00, skrev rhertz:

Einstein plagiarized 1898 Gerber's equation, which gave the exact and
desired value for the advance of Mercury's perihelion.
 Gerber final equation for the extra advance ε (giving the 43"/century)
was published as follows (I merged the two final Gerber's equations into
a single one):
 𝜖 = 24π³ a²/[c² T² (1 - e²)]
 On his Nov. 1915 paper, Einstein reached to this equation (N° 13, in
geometrical units)
 𝜖 =3π [α/[a.(1 - e²)]]
 The gravitational potential α had been declared in the first part of the
paper as Φ = -α/2r. So, he HACKED the value of α by DOUBLING IT, in
order to obtain Gerber's equation.
 In the last equation of the 1915 paper, he transformed Eq. 13 into Eq.
14, which is EXACTLY the Gerber's equation written above.
 To do so, and using an equivalence funded in the Third Kepler law, he
INSERTED in Eq.13 this value of α:
 α = 8π² a³/[c² T²]  = 2 GM/c² (curiously, it's the Schwarzschild radius
for the Sun).
 The above equation is "based" on Kepler's 3rd. law, which states that:
 a³ ∝ T² (proportional to)
 By 1900, it was accepted that the proportion was:
 a³/T² = GM/(4π²)
 but the crook used THIS ONE:
 a³/T² = 2GM/(8π²) , which allowed to match EXACTLY 1898 Gerber's
formula, by replacing α with it.
 There is NO EXPLANATION in the 1915 paper on Mercury about THE REASON by
which he DOUBLED the value of α.
 The only possible explanation is that he commited FRAUD, in order to
obtain the 43"/cy. Otherwise, he only would have got 21.5"/cy, very
close to what he written with his own hand (18") in some place of the 54
pages of the lost Einstein-Besso manuscript, that only saw the light in
1954, after Besso's death.
 Finally, I'm shure that his ADVISOR Schwarzschild had a cut in the 1915
paper that he presented to the Prussian Academy of Science. Even when he
was serving as a Lieutenant on the Eastern Front (WWI),  Schwarzschild
made sure to be present on that day (Nov. 18, 1915). After all, he was
not at the vanguard of the eastern front.
 Just ONE MONTH AFTER THIS PRESENTATION, Schwarzschild came out with his
analytical solution that formally introduced what is known today as the
Schwarzschild´s radius formula.
 TOO MANY COINCIDENCES AND TOO MUCH ROTTEN FISH AROUND GR INTRODUCTION IN
SOCIETY.

What's the point with this whining about who said what first,
and who plagiarised who?
Today, 2024, we know:
GR predicts that the the perihelion advance for a planet is:
see equation (8) in:
https://paulba.no/pdf/GRPerihelionAdvance.pdf
This is calculated many times by many different people since 1915.
You may see the formula in different forms, but they all predicts
the same. And they are experimentally confirmed for several planets.
What Einstein wrote in 1915 is mostly of historical interest now.
But it _is_ interesting that he got it right, isn't it?
--
Paul
https://paulba.no/