Re: Newton: Photon falling from h meters increase its energy.

Den 14.01.2025 01:36, skrev LaurenceClarkCrossen:

On Mon, 13 Jan 2025 18:54:29 +0000, Paul.B.Andersen wrote:
 

GR's prediction for the gravitational deflection of EM-radiation
is so thoroughly experimentally confirmed that you have to be
extremely ignorant not to accept it.
>

"This is exactly double the value given in 1911, and this doubling
of values has given rise to many speculations, and to many and
varied explanations, on the part of the relativists.

Everybody knows that his 1911 prediction is wrong.
It is in fact the Newtonian prediction.
So what?
It is a fact that experiments have shown that GR correctly
predicts how light is gravitational deflected.

An inspection of the formulas, which Einstein used, shows
exactly what he did and how he derived this result. The essential
factor in the formula is that for the rate of change of velocity
along the wave-front 6c, 6x ; and this is the only factor in which
any change can be made. All the other terms and factors of the
formula are always identically the same." - Poor = "THE RELATIVITY
DEFLECTION OF LIGHT!"

Why don't you understand that it is hopeless to claim that
the GR equation  Θ = 4GM/Δ⋅c² is wrong?
During the 100+ years since Einstein wrote the GR paper,
the calculation is repeated _many_ times by different physicists.
It is a _fact_ that GR predicts that the gravitational deflection
of light is  Θ = 4GM/Δ⋅c².
See:
https://paulba.no/paper/PPN_gamma_Hipparcos.pdf
https://paulba.no/paper/PPN_gamma_Cassini.pdf
https://paulba.no/paper/Shapiro_2004.pdf
https://paulba.no/paper/Fomalont.pdf
https://paulba.no/paper/PPN_gamma_Cassini_2.pdf
GR's prediction for the gravitational deflection of EM-radiation
is so thoroughly experimentally confirmed that you have to be
extremely ignorant not to accept it.
--
Paul
https://paulba.no/