Re: RE: Re: RE: Re: Helmet efficacy test

Liste des GroupesRevenir à sp relativity 
Sujet : Re: RE: Re: RE: Re: Helmet efficacy test
De : frkrygow (at) *nospam* sbcglobal.net (Frank Krygowski)
Groupes : rec.bicycles.tech
Date : 26. Mar 2025, 04:15:20
Autres entêtes
Organisation : A noiseless patient Spider
Message-ID : <vrvrg9$j8eo$15@dont-email.me>
References : 1 2 3 4 5 6
User-Agent : Mozilla Thunderbird
On 3/25/2025 12:36 PM, cyclintom wrote:
On Tue Mar 25 10:36:01 2025 Frank Krygowski  wrote:
>
First, I don't know that's true. Based on your claims here, I think my
typical riding speed is faster than yours. I'm sure I couldn't keep up
with Zen or Mark, but I suspect most of us old guys here would ride at
similar speeds. I know that on the club rides I attend (I'm typically
the oldest of the attendees) I usually finish in the front half of the
group, and often first. Not that they're races. I just enjoy speeding up
at times.
>
Not that it matters. I dispute the implication that faster riders
naturally crash more. It takes miles of riding to get fast, and people
with miles of experience tend to be more skillful.
>
You may be an exception.
    Frank, obviously you do not ride with a Garmin and believe that my claim of riding an average soeed of 11 mph is slow.
You're right. I don't use a Garmin. I still use ordinary cyclometers - a couple Avocets that I've managed to keep running, and a couple Cateyes, etc. They give me average speed. 11 mph _is_ slow. I don't think I've ever averaged that slow unless on a recreation ride with my wife, grandkids or a good friend who is quite slow.
--
- Frank Krygowski

Date Sujet#  Auteur
27 May 25 o 

Haut de la page

Les messages affichés proviennent d'usenet.

NewsPortal