Re: Why a time of the real world must be galilean

Le 15/12/2024 à 14:53, Maciej Wozniak a écrit :
..

The source?

>
http://ttc.web.cern.ch/LEB00Sync.pdf

>
But the document is signed "Varela, J", not
"Einstein, A".

 If you expected a paper on synchonization at LHC to be written by Albert Einstein

 I didn't, but for sure I was expecting stinker
Python to lie that the synchronization for LHC
has been provided by his [A.E.]

I didn't lie. Either you did or you've shown your ignorance (both not excluded).
The synchronization procedure that A.E. provided is actually used in practice at LHC. Face it.

The practical implementation of a theoretical procedure

  It is not, of course. It's fibre, the speed of a
signal in fibre is much lesser than c and - well
- obviously depending on the speed   of the fibre.
Just one of the differences.

The procedure only requires a signal with a constant speed with respect to the source. Light in vaccum is ok, light in a fiber too. Even a gun shooting peas could be ok if you don't need much precision.
As a matter of fact (you don't like such a word, right?) when you apply the procedure to derive offsets to apply to clocks you'll end with formulas that does not even involve the speed of the signal or the distance between them. See : https://noedge.net/e/

Still convinced that Gdańsk and Warsaw
are not in relative move? Well, subtracting
their velocities doesn't give 0 in either
your galilean nonsense

I sometime forgot that you depise Galileo as much as Einstein.
As much as everyone on Earth but yourself, btw.

or in your einsteinian
idiocy. Do you have your own Python's
tranformations for subtracting them a way
giving 0?

Making a diversion from one of your blunders by another of your blunders is not very effective, you know?

Idiot. Poor stinker.

Nice signature though.