Re: [SR] Usefulness of real velocities in accelerated relativistic frames of reference.

Den 15.03.2024 15:20, skrev Richard Hachel:

Le 15/03/2024 à 15:11, "Paul B. Andersen" a écrit :

I am saying that SR does not predict that accelerated objects
will behave as you claim they do.

 We agree.
The SR does not predict things the way I predict them.

Right. You predict them like Newton did.
Richard Hachel's equations:
  Speed of rocket in inertial frame:             Vr=a.Tr
  Average speed of rocket in the inertial frame: Vrm=(1/2)Vr
Are correct only in Newtonian Mechanics with Galilean relativity.
So Richard Hachel's theory is identical to Newtonian Mechanics.

The problem, although enormous, is that experimentally I am credible and not the SR which cannot explain instantaneous transfers of information.

Why should SR "explain" what doesn't exist?
You know of course that SR is thoroughly experimentally verified
and never falsified, while NM is falsified.

and that theoretically I do not have the enormous concern of completely inconsistent apparent speeds. if only in a simple Langevin paradox.

Are there "inconsistent apparent speeds" in the "twin paradox"? :-D
--
Paul
https://paulba.no/