Sujet : Re: New addition to the list of Relativity Critics/Skeptics
De : clzb93ynxj (at) *nospam* att.net (LaurenceClarkCrossen)
Groupes : sci.physics.relativityDate : 18. Mar 2024, 21:54:22
Autres entêtes
Organisation : novaBBS
Message-ID : <4e1f31ab3ec561b5b8d7159cb8fc3e30@www.novabbs.com>
References : 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8
User-Agent : Rocksolid Light
A better link criticizing Callahan would be this provided by Anderton:
https://www.laphamsquarterly.org/roundtable/beware-cranksAt bottom, relativists dismiss Callahan on the basis of his failed attempt to trisect an angle, making that an excuse for not answering his criticisms of relativity and its non-Euclidean geometry.
Relativists don't refute Callahan because they are unable to. We can dismiss Einstein and relativity even more easily.
He embraced the Lorentz Transformation, the purpose of which is to save the ether from the null result.
He discarded the ether.
He kept the LT for no good reason.
Einstein was a quack. So are you.