Sujet : Re: New addition to the list of Relativity Critics/Skeptics
De : nospam (at) *nospam* de-ster.demon.nl (J. J. Lodder)
Groupes : sci.physics.relativityDate : 26. Mar 2024, 17:46:35
Autres entêtes
Organisation : De Ster
Message-ID : <1qqz2ig.f3zax3x2ft1yN%nospam@de-ster.demon.nl>
References : 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9
User-Agent : MacSOUP/2.8.5 (ea919cf118) (Mac OS 10.12.6)
LaurenceClarkCrossen <
clzb93ynxj@att.net> wrote:
Obviously, Wolfram describes two lines that must intersect because they
are not parallel since the sum of the angles is less than 180 degrees. You
are a dunce at geometry!
The two versions can be proven to be equivalent.
As far as infinity being in Euclid, I have already proven it. His lines
were infinite and every authority agrees with me. You are making a stupid
mistake.
So you still have not understood the difference
between an actual and a potential infinity?
Consult Aristotle,
Jan