Re: [SR] Dismaying intellectual desert?

Liste des GroupesRevenir à sp relativity 
Sujet : Re: [SR] Dismaying intellectual desert?
De : relativity (at) *nospam* paulba.no (Paul B. Andersen)
Groupes : sci.physics.relativity
Date : 31. Mar 2024, 13:08:56
Autres entêtes
Organisation : i2pn2 (i2pn.org)
Message-ID : <uubjl8$3kff5$1@i2pn2.org>
References : 1 2 3
User-Agent : Mozilla Thunderbird
Den 30.03.2024 14:31, skrev Richard Hachel:
 > Le 30/03/2024 à 13:20, "Paul B. Andersen" a écrit :
 >> Den 29.03.2024 14:25, skrev Richard Hachel:
 >>> For a long time now, I have provided proof that the theory of relativity, at least as taught today, was incorrect.
 >> I have missed that.
 >> I suppose you must have written a paper describing your
 >> experiment and its results. Is it available?
 >>
 >> I would like to include your experiment here:
 >> https://paulba.no/paper/index.html
 >>
 >> If your experiment really falsifies SR, you will have made
 >> your place in the history of physics.
 >>
 >> Congratulations!
 > I have already had my experiences for 40 years or more.
Experience, but no experiment? :-D
SR is a consistent theory.
It is only one way to falsify a consistent theory,
that is to show that the predictions of the theory
are not in accordance with measurements.
You claim to have falsified SR, so you must have made
an experiment which falsifies SR.
Or where you lying?
 > My theory is simple and very clear.
Indeed. And experimentally falsified.
May I remind you:
| Den 27.03.2024 07:23, skrev Richard Hachel:
|> Le 26/03/2024 à 21:45, "Paul B. Andersen" a écrit :
|>>
|>> Are you claiming that the real speed of the protons in the LHC is
|>>   Vr = 6927⋅c ?
|>
|> Absolutely.
|>
|> That's what I said.
| Den 27.03.2024 07:23, skrev Richard Hachel:
|> Le 26/03/2024 à 21:45, "Paul B. Andersen" a écrit :
|>>
|>> You are claiming that the protons are going around the ≈ 27 km ring
|>> ≈ 78 million times per second.
|>> The real value is ≈ 11.25 thousand times per second.
|>
|> CERN physicists are doing their job.
|> We have accustomed them to working at classic relativistic speed.
|> So it makes sense that they find the speed they expect.
|> I tell them that the proton rotates 78 million times per second,
It is experimentally proved that no accelerator would work
if charged particles didn't behave _exactly_ as predicted by SR.
Doctor Richard Hachel's theory predicts that protons behave
very differently from what SR predicts.
Doctor Richard Hachel's theory is experimentally falsified.
It's no way you can save your theory, Richard!
--
Paul
https://paulba.no/

Date Sujet#  Auteur
29 Mar 24 * [SR] Dismaying intellectual desert?54Richard Hachel
29 Mar 24 +- Re: [SR] Dismaying intellectual desert?1Mee'k Pagano Selvaggio
30 Mar 24 +* Re: [SR] Dismaying intellectual desert?46Paul B. Andersen
30 Mar 24 i+- Re: [SR] Dismaying intellectual desert?1Richard Hachel
30 Mar 24 i`* Re: [SR] Dismaying intellectual desert?44Richard Hachel
31 Mar 24 i `* Re: [SR] Dismaying intellectual desert?43Paul B. Andersen
31 Mar 24 i  +* Re: [SR] Dismaying intellectual desert?26Richard Hachel
31 Mar 24 i  i+* Re: [SR] Dismaying intellectual desert?6Volney
31 Mar 24 i  ii`* Re: [SR] Dismaying intellectual desert?5Richard Hachel
31 Mar 24 i  ii +- Re: [SR] Dismaying intellectual desert?1Gaylord Chalyh Turubanov
2 Apr 24 i  ii `* Re: [SR] Dismaying intellectual desert?3Volney
2 Apr 24 i  ii  +- Re: [SR] Dismaying intellectual desert?1Mitchel Shirinkin Balahowski
2 Apr 24 i  ii  `- Re: [SR] Dismaying intellectual desert?1Ren Christakos Haritopoulos
1 Apr 24 i  i`* Re: [SR] Dismaying intellectual desert?19Paul B. Andersen
1 Apr 24 i  i `* Re: [SR] Dismaying intellectual desert?18Richard Hachel
2 Apr 24 i  i  `* Re: [SR] Dismaying intellectual desert?17Paul B. Andersen
2 Apr 24 i  i   +* Re: [SR] Dismaying intellectual desert?5Richard Hachel
3 Apr 24 i  i   i`* Re: [SR] Dismaying intellectual desert?4Maciej Wozniak
4 Apr 24 i  i   i `* Re: [SR] Dismaying intellectual desert?3Richard Hachel
4 Apr 24 i  i   i  +- Re: [SR] Dismaying intellectual desert?1Ross Finlayson
5 Apr 24 i  i   i  `- Re: [SR] Dismaying intellectual desert?1Paul B. Andersen
2 Apr 24 i  i   +- Re: [SR] Dismaying intellectual desert?1Richard Hachel
2 Apr 24 i  i   `* Re: [SR] Dismaying intellectual desert?10Richard Hachel
2 Apr 24 i  i    `* Re: [SR] Dismaying intellectual desert?9Python
2 Apr 24 i  i     +- Re: [SR] Dismaying intellectual desert?1Python
2 Apr 24 i  i     `* Re: [SR] Dismaying intellectual desert?7Richard Hachel
2 Apr 24 i  i      `* Re: [SR] Dismaying intellectual desert?6Python
3 Apr 24 i  i       `* Re: [SR] Dismaying intellectual desert?5Python
3 Apr 24 i  i        `* Re: [SR] Dismaying intellectual desert?4Maciej Wozniak
3 Apr 24 i  i         `* Re: [SR] Dismaying intellectual desert?3Python
4 Apr 24 i  i          `* Re: [SR] Dismaying intellectual desert?2Maciej Wozniak
4 Apr 24 i  i           `- Re: [SR] Dismaying intellectual desert?1Sammie Pásztor Buzás
31 Mar 24 i  `* Re: [SR] Dismaying intellectual desert?16Richard Hachel
31 Mar 24 i   +* Re: [SR] Dismaying intellectual desert?11Volney
31 Mar 24 i   i+- Re: [SR] Dismaying intellectual desert?1Maciej Wozniak
31 Mar 24 i   i`* Re: [SR] Dismaying intellectual desert?9Richard Hachel
31 Mar 24 i   i +* Re: [SR] Dismaying intellectual desert?7Athel Cornish-Bowden
31 Mar 24 i   i i+* Re: [SR] Dismaying intellectual desert?5Richard Hachel
1 Apr 24 i   i ii`* Re: [SR] Dismaying intellectual desert?4Athel Cornish-Bowden
1 Apr 24 i   i ii `* Re: [SR] Dismaying intellectual desert?3Richard Hachel
1 Apr 24 i   i ii  +- Re: [SR] Dismaying intellectual desert?1Athel Cornish-Bowden
2 Apr 24 i   i ii  `- Re: [SR] Dismaying intellectual desert?1Volney
1 Apr 24 i   i i`- Re: [SR] Dismaying intellectual desert?1gharnagel
2 Apr 24 i   i `- Re: [SR] Dismaying intellectual desert?1Volney
1 Apr 24 i   `* Re: [SR] Dismaying intellectual desert?4Paul B. Andersen
1 Apr 24 i    `* Re: [SR] Dismaying intellectual desert?3Richard Hachel
2 Apr 24 i     +- Re: [SR] Dismaying intellectual desert?1Paul B. Andersen
2 Apr 24 i     `- Re: [SR] Dismaying intellectual desert?1Volney
2 Apr 24 +* Re: [SR] Dismaying intellectual desert?4Arindam Banerjee
2 Apr 24 i`* Re: [SR] Dismaying intellectual desert?3Richard Hachel
2 Apr 24 i +- Re: [SR] Dismaying intellectual desert?1Arindam Banerjee
2 Apr 24 i `- Re: [SR] Dismaying intellectual desert?1Arindam Banerjee
2 Apr 24 `* Re: [SR] Dismaying intellectual desert?2JanPB
2 Apr 24  `- Re: [SR] Dismaying intellectual desert?1Richard Hachel

Haut de la page

Les messages affichés proviennent d'usenet.

NewsPortal