Re: [SR] Dismaying intellectual desert?

Athel Cornish-Bowden wrote:

>
On 2024-03-31 15:06:43 +0000, Richard Hachel said:

>
Le 31/03/2024 à 13:36, Volney a écrit :

>
On 3/31/2024 8:30 AM, Richard Hachel wrote:

 Who has the best theory? Hachel, or all a clique of stupid physicists who don't want to do science, but the poor cock competition?
 

The best theory is the one which matches experimental results.
Point out just one experiment which has results inconsistent with SR (within its domain) but agrees with "Dr." Richard Hachel's predictions. Just one.

 One will not be enough more than ten.
 I think you still don't understand the human problem.
 Look at what is happening today in Ukraine. Proof will not be enough to demonstrate that it is the Westerners who are seeking war with the Russians and not the other way around.
 You can put ten, twenty proofs, you won't succeed.
 We won't tell you, if you turn on your TV (in France): "Putin intervened in Ukraine, because he cannot do without Crimea
as an essential war port, because it can no longer tolerate eight years of bombings and massacres of the Russian-speaking populations of Ukraine, the ban on speaking Russian, the presence of thermo-nuclear missiles on its border.
 No way.
 We tell you, minute after minute, on French television: "Putin is evil, he invaded Ukraine, he will then invade Europe, and he will eat the children in the incubators and rape all the little girls aged six years".

>
I watch French television every day. Even allowing for exaggeration I have never heard anything like that. That tells me all I need to know for assessing the likely accuracy of the things you say about relativity. That, and the reality of you supposed doctorate.

This is a relativity discussion group, so I judge Hachel primarily on what
he says about relativity.  However, if I know he's lying about some other
subject, that would color my thinking, but not cause me to reject what he
says about relativity.
You, OTOH, seem to employ irrelevant issues to dismiss the main argument.
That, of course, is the easy way, but it's akin to attacking the messenger
rather than the message.  If you remember, you did that to me :-(