Re: [SR] Dismaying intellectual desert?

Le 01/04/2024 à 21:58, "Paul B. Andersen" a écrit :

Den 31.03.2024 14:30, skrev Richard Hachel:

Le 31/03/2024 à 14:07, "Paul B. Andersen" a écrit :

Den 30.03.2024 14:31, skrev Richard Hachel:

 

Doctor Richard Hachel's theory is experimentally falsified.

 Can you show me a little fact of it.

 Again? I have done it several times, but OK:
 It is experimentally proved that the speed of protons
in the Large Hadron Collider never exceed c.
 Richard Hachel's "theory" predicts that the speed of protons
in the Large Hadron Collider is  6927⋅c.
 Richard Hachel's "theory" is falsified.
 

 A very small.
 And I am silent, gentlemen.
 Even the Nobel Prize winner Alain Aspect says that I am right about the principle of non-locality, 

 Can you please explain how non-locality affects the predictions of SR?
Does it make any of the following confirmations of SR invalid?
 https://paulba.no/paper/index.html
 

the greatest mathematician in the world, Henri Poincaré, says that I am right when I write "There will therefore exist an impenetrable limit speed which will extend to all particles, bodies and laws of the universe.

 Quite.
And we know that the impenetrable limit speed is c.
 So why do you claim that the speed of protons can be 6927⋅c?
 

I simply combine the two.

 So if you combine non-locality and the principle that c is
an impenetrable limit speed, you find that the speed of
protons can be 6927⋅c ?
 

Scientists can't.
Who has the best theory? Hachel, or all a clique of stupid physicists who don't want to do science, but the poor cock competition?

 Your falsified theory is obviously much better than
the theory that's never falsified.
Right? :-D

 Je ne prends pas la peine de répondre.
 Ca n'en vaut malheureusement pas la peine.
 R.H.