Re: [SR] Dismaying intellectual desert?

Liste des GroupesRevenir à sp relativity 
Sujet : Re: [SR] Dismaying intellectual desert?
De : python (at) *nospam* org.invalid (Python)
Groupes : sci.physics.relativity
Date : 03. Apr 2024, 22:01:28
Autres entêtes
Organisation : Nemoweb
Message-ID : <KPJf3bDJM6eF5BjWsUmGx9i_BWk@jntp>
References : 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10
User-Agent : Nemo/0.999a
Le 03/04/2024 à 08:31, Maciej Wozniak a écrit :
W dniu 03.04.2024 o 07:39, Python pisze:
Le 03/04/2024 à 07:15, Maciej Wozniak a écrit :
W dniu 02.04.2024 o 23:39, Python pisze:
Le 02/04/2024 à 22:59, Richard Hachel a écrit :
Le 02/04/2024 à 21:10, Maciej Wozniak a écrit :
W dniu 02.04.2024 o 20:39, Python pisze:
>
You are an incurable hypocrite, Richard.
>
And a pathological liar.
All the worshippers  of your idiot guru are.
BTW, have you already learnt what a function is?
>
I pay no attention to the criticisms of Jean-Pierre Python, he is known on physics forums for being a clown.
He doesn't understand anything, and gets mixed up on the problems of special relativity that he thinks he has mastered and which he doesn't master at all. He nevertheless believes himself to be the world's best critic in physical and mathematical science.
>
Absolutely not, I have not the kind of delusion of grandeur you have.
>
You are the one with absolutely no education in science and no will to
>
Oh, stinker Python is opening its muzzle again,
and trying again to pretend he knows something.
Tell me, poor stinker, have you already learnt
what a function is? Is "for any element of
the domain" clause still confusing you?
 https://fr.wikipedia.org/wiki/Application_(math%C3%A9matiques)
 "Le terme est concurrencé par celui de fonction, bien que celui-ci désigne parfois plus spécifiquement les applications dont le but est un ensemble de nombres et parfois, au contraire, englobe plus largement les relations pour lesquelles chaque élément de l'ensemble de départ est relié à au plus un élément de l'ensemble d'arrivée."
 Now shut the fuck up, idiot...
 Still confused; you're such an idiot.
Well, under the link you provided -
click blue "fonction" word and read:
"et parfois, au contraire ... est relié à au plus un élément "
You can't read French, can you Maciej? Do you need a translator?

En mathématiques, une fonction permet de définir un résultat (le plus souvent numérique) pour chaque élément d’un ensemble appelé domaine.
 Of course, whatever you'll read, being
stupid is not curable.
Oh dear... How come that one of "the better logicians Humanity ever had"
cannot grasp that a single world can have multiple definitions even among
a single community at a given time. Context is quite a too subtle concept
for you.
Fact is that "starting set" ("ensemble de départ") and domain ("domaine de
definition") are, even today, not assumed to be identical in the French
educational system. You can whine as much as you want, it is a fact.
And it doesn't really matter, but you only focus on what does not matter,
aren't you Maciej? Because you are soooo confused about when things matter.

Date Sujet#  Auteur
29 Mar 24 * [SR] Dismaying intellectual desert?54Richard Hachel
29 Mar 24 +- Re: [SR] Dismaying intellectual desert?1Mee'k Pagano Selvaggio
30 Mar 24 +* Re: [SR] Dismaying intellectual desert?46Paul B. Andersen
30 Mar 24 i+- Re: [SR] Dismaying intellectual desert?1Richard Hachel
30 Mar 24 i`* Re: [SR] Dismaying intellectual desert?44Richard Hachel
31 Mar 24 i `* Re: [SR] Dismaying intellectual desert?43Paul B. Andersen
31 Mar 24 i  +* Re: [SR] Dismaying intellectual desert?26Richard Hachel
31 Mar 24 i  i+* Re: [SR] Dismaying intellectual desert?6Volney
31 Mar 24 i  ii`* Re: [SR] Dismaying intellectual desert?5Richard Hachel
31 Mar 24 i  ii +- Re: [SR] Dismaying intellectual desert?1Gaylord Chalyh Turubanov
2 Apr 24 i  ii `* Re: [SR] Dismaying intellectual desert?3Volney
2 Apr 24 i  ii  +- Re: [SR] Dismaying intellectual desert?1Mitchel Shirinkin Balahowski
2 Apr 24 i  ii  `- Re: [SR] Dismaying intellectual desert?1Ren Christakos Haritopoulos
1 Apr 24 i  i`* Re: [SR] Dismaying intellectual desert?19Paul B. Andersen
1 Apr 24 i  i `* Re: [SR] Dismaying intellectual desert?18Richard Hachel
2 Apr 24 i  i  `* Re: [SR] Dismaying intellectual desert?17Paul B. Andersen
2 Apr 24 i  i   +* Re: [SR] Dismaying intellectual desert?5Richard Hachel
3 Apr 24 i  i   i`* Re: [SR] Dismaying intellectual desert?4Maciej Wozniak
4 Apr 24 i  i   i `* Re: [SR] Dismaying intellectual desert?3Richard Hachel
4 Apr 24 i  i   i  +- Re: [SR] Dismaying intellectual desert?1Ross Finlayson
5 Apr 24 i  i   i  `- Re: [SR] Dismaying intellectual desert?1Paul B. Andersen
2 Apr 24 i  i   +- Re: [SR] Dismaying intellectual desert?1Richard Hachel
2 Apr 24 i  i   `* Re: [SR] Dismaying intellectual desert?10Richard Hachel
2 Apr 24 i  i    `* Re: [SR] Dismaying intellectual desert?9Python
2 Apr 24 i  i     +- Re: [SR] Dismaying intellectual desert?1Python
2 Apr 24 i  i     `* Re: [SR] Dismaying intellectual desert?7Richard Hachel
2 Apr 24 i  i      `* Re: [SR] Dismaying intellectual desert?6Python
3 Apr 24 i  i       `* Re: [SR] Dismaying intellectual desert?5Python
3 Apr 24 i  i        `* Re: [SR] Dismaying intellectual desert?4Maciej Wozniak
3 Apr 24 i  i         `* Re: [SR] Dismaying intellectual desert?3Python
4 Apr 24 i  i          `* Re: [SR] Dismaying intellectual desert?2Maciej Wozniak
4 Apr 24 i  i           `- Re: [SR] Dismaying intellectual desert?1Sammie Pásztor Buzás
31 Mar 24 i  `* Re: [SR] Dismaying intellectual desert?16Richard Hachel
31 Mar 24 i   +* Re: [SR] Dismaying intellectual desert?11Volney
31 Mar 24 i   i+- Re: [SR] Dismaying intellectual desert?1Maciej Wozniak
31 Mar 24 i   i`* Re: [SR] Dismaying intellectual desert?9Richard Hachel
31 Mar 24 i   i +* Re: [SR] Dismaying intellectual desert?7Athel Cornish-Bowden
31 Mar 24 i   i i+* Re: [SR] Dismaying intellectual desert?5Richard Hachel
1 Apr 24 i   i ii`* Re: [SR] Dismaying intellectual desert?4Athel Cornish-Bowden
1 Apr 24 i   i ii `* Re: [SR] Dismaying intellectual desert?3Richard Hachel
1 Apr 24 i   i ii  +- Re: [SR] Dismaying intellectual desert?1Athel Cornish-Bowden
2 Apr 24 i   i ii  `- Re: [SR] Dismaying intellectual desert?1Volney
1 Apr 24 i   i i`- Re: [SR] Dismaying intellectual desert?1gharnagel
2 Apr 24 i   i `- Re: [SR] Dismaying intellectual desert?1Volney
1 Apr 24 i   `* Re: [SR] Dismaying intellectual desert?4Paul B. Andersen
1 Apr 24 i    `* Re: [SR] Dismaying intellectual desert?3Richard Hachel
2 Apr 24 i     +- Re: [SR] Dismaying intellectual desert?1Paul B. Andersen
2 Apr 24 i     `- Re: [SR] Dismaying intellectual desert?1Volney
2 Apr 24 +* Re: [SR] Dismaying intellectual desert?4Arindam Banerjee
2 Apr 24 i`* Re: [SR] Dismaying intellectual desert?3Richard Hachel
2 Apr 24 i +- Re: [SR] Dismaying intellectual desert?1Arindam Banerjee
2 Apr 24 i `- Re: [SR] Dismaying intellectual desert?1Arindam Banerjee
2 Apr 24 `* Re: [SR] Dismaying intellectual desert?2JanPB
2 Apr 24  `- Re: [SR] Dismaying intellectual desert?1Richard Hachel

Haut de la page

Les messages affichés proviennent d'usenet.

NewsPortal