Re: Accelerated frame and Tau Ceti problem

On 06/01/2024 09:58 AM, palsing wrote:

Richard Hachel wrote:
>

We know the famous example of Doctor Hachel (that's me) entitled "the
traveler of Tau Ceti".

>

The Tau Ceti traveler is characteristic of special relativity, and its
simplicity of understanding
(but no resolution) is now famous throughout the world.

>

We imagine a young woman, named Bella, to differentiate her from Stella
>
who is used to always traveling, in the examples, in uniform Galilean
movement. Beautiful journey always in accelerated mode at 10m/s² (i.e.
1.052ly/year²) starting from the earth.

>

Physicists, because they are curious, and above all competent, will
easily calculate how long the journey in the terrestrial frame of
reference
will last.

>

We will then place a watch on earth, a watch at 3 ly, a watch at 6 ly,
a
>

>
>

Doctor Hachel, who is not an idiot (a doctorate, three Nobel prizes)
validates Paul's equation, and considers it to be completely accurate.

>
Now we know for certain that you are a bald-faced liar. No person has
ever won the Nobel 3 times, although one institution has...
>
https://en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/Nobel_Prize#:~:text=The%20Nobel%20Prizes%2C%20beginning%20in,more%20than%20one%20Nobel%20Prize.
>
>
Laureates who have received multiple Nobel Prizes: (by date of second
Prize)
Marie Curie; received the prize twice. Nobel Prize in Physics (1903) and
Nobel Prize in Chemistry (1911).
International Committee of the Red Cross; received the prize thrice.
Nobel Peace Prize (1917, 1944, 1963).
Linus Pauling; received the prize twice. Nobel Prize in Chemistry (1954)
and Nobel Peace Prize (1962).
John Bardeen; received the prize twice. Nobel Prize in Physics (1956,
1972).
Frederick Sanger; received the prize twice. Nobel Prize in Chemistry
(1958, 1980).
United Nations High Commissioner for Refugees; received the prize twice.
Nobel Peace Prize (1954, 1981).
Karl Barry Sharpless; received the prize twice. Nobel Prize in Chemistry
(2001, 2022).

There was some round table at the Nobel committee the other day,
all these Nobel prize winners at a round table, and they were
explaining how important the Nobel prize winners were and how
important supporting climate, poverty, and conflict refugees was
and how important all kinds of variety and diversity is, and I
wondered, you know if you just give them all Nobel prizes there's
enough gold in one then they would have some money to solve all
their problems.
If that's not enough I suppose there's just printing money,
then when not enough trees to grow money on, there's just
this usual "emit 0's and 1's and call that money",
as long as nobody hits the giant "delete" button.
About boost-addition and usual time-keeping problems, there's something
to be said for the Galilean again according to the Lorentzian that's
FitzGeraldian, and furthermore the FitzGeraldian of the
space-contraction variety and governed by GR and governing SR, then
about getting into the equivalency principle and so on and this
kind of thing, that the linear and kinetics and rotational and
kinematics are so fundamentally different, and about classical
mechanics and mechanics and at least some notion of the infinitely
many higher orders of acceleration in any kind of dynamics, is
that, you know, boost-addition adds up as pretty Galilean.