Re: SpaceTime

Liste des GroupesRevenir à sp relativity 
Sujet : Re: SpaceTime
De : hitlong (at) *nospam* yahoo.com (gharnagel)
Groupes : sci.physics.relativity
Date : 03. Jun 2024, 03:12:18
Autres entêtes
Organisation : novaBBS
Message-ID : <5a03b3defc4af4304b84f5d6059306b0@www.novabbs.com>
References : 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13
User-Agent : Rocksolid Light
Ross Finlayson wrote:
>
On 06/02/2024 04:22 PM, gharnagel wrote:
>
More invalid analogies.

Yeah, if you assume causality, then tachyons can't be fantastical,
they're only the result of something that is or did.
>
The neutrino physics are mostly about supersymmetry.
Nope.  Neutrinos are firmly ensconced in the Standard model of
particle physics, while supersymmetric particles are not.

If you assume lack of causality it's pretty easy to arrive at
itself.
That's the problem with the conventional view of FTL phenomena.
It comes from the Lorentz transform:
(1) dx' = gamma(dx - v dt)
(2) dt' = gamma(dt - v dx/c^2)
From that comes
dx'/dt' = u' = (dx - v dt)/(dt - v dx/c^2)
u' = (u - v)/(1 - uv/c^2)
u' becomes infinite when u = c^2/v, and infinity is a red flag
in physics.  It means that the math becomes useless at and beyond
that point.  Physicists, who should know better, have persisted
into that real and come up with all kinds of frivolous assertions
like time going backwards, negative energy, causality violation
and a "reinterpretation principle."

Date Sujet#  Auteur
1 Jun 24 * Re: SpaceTime47gharnagel
1 Jun 24 +- Re: SpaceTime1Ross Finlayson
2 Jun 24 `* Re: SpaceTime45Thomas Heger
2 Jun 24  `* Re: SpaceTime44gharnagel
2 Jun 24   +* Re: SpaceTime42Maciej Wozniak
2 Jun 24   i`* Re: SpaceTime41gharnagel
2 Jun 24   i +- Re: SpaceTime1Maciej Wozniak
2 Jun 24   i `* Re: SpaceTime39Ross Finlayson
2 Jun 24   i  +* Re: SpaceTime34gharnagel
2 Jun 24   i  i+* Re: SpaceTime2Ross Finlayson
3 Jun 24   i  ii`- Re: SpaceTime1Thomas Heger
2 Jun 24   i  i+- Re: SpaceTime1Dmitriy Makricosta
2 Jun 24   i  i`* Re: SpaceTime30Richard Hachel
3 Jun 24   i  i `* Re: SpaceTime29gharnagel
3 Jun 24   i  i  +* Re: SpaceTime3Richard Hachel
3 Jun 24   i  i  i`* Re: SpaceTime2gharnagel
3 Jun 24   i  i  i `- Re: SpaceTime1Ross Finlayson
3 Jun 24   i  i  +* Re: SpaceTime4Richard Hachel
3 Jun 24   i  i  i+- Re: SpaceTime1Ross Finlayson
3 Jun 24   i  i  i`* Re: SpaceTime2gharnagel
3 Jun 24   i  i  i `- Re: SpaceTime1Hank Bogdán
3 Jun 24   i  i  `* Re: SpaceTime21Ross Finlayson
3 Jun 24   i  i   +- Re: SpaceTime1Ross Finlayson
3 Jun 24   i  i   `* Re: SpaceTime19gharnagel
3 Jun 24   i  i    +* Re: SpaceTime7Ross Finlayson
3 Jun 24   i  i    i+* Re: SpaceTime5Ross Finlayson
3 Jun 24   i  i    ii`* Re: SpaceTime4Ross Finlayson
3 Jun 24   i  i    ii `* Re: SpaceTime3Ross Finlayson
3 Jun 24   i  i    ii  `* Re: SpaceTime2Ross Finlayson
5 Jun 24   i  i    ii   `- Re: SpaceTime1Ross Finlayson
3 Jun 24   i  i    i`- Re: SpaceTime1Maciej Wozniak
4 Jun 24   i  i    `* Re: SpaceTime11Richard Hachel
4 Jun 24   i  i     `* Re: SpaceTime10Python
5 Jun 24   i  i      +- Re: SpaceTime1Richard Hachel
5 Jun 24   i  i      `* Re: SpaceTime8gharnagel
5 Jun 24   i  i       +* Re: SpaceTime3Maciej Wozniak
5 Jun 24   i  i       i`* Re: SpaceTime2gharnagel
5 Jun 24   i  i       i `- Re: SpaceTime1Maciej Wozniak
5 Jun 24   i  i       +- Re: SpaceTime1Richard Hachel
5 Jun 24   i  i       `* Re: SpaceTime3Richard Hachel
5 Jun 24   i  i        `* Re: SpaceTime2gharnagel
5 Jun 24   i  i         `- Re: SpaceTime1gharnagel
2 Jun 24   i  `* Re: SpaceTime4Maciej Wozniak
2 Jun 24   i   `* Re: SpaceTime3Ross Finlayson
2 Jun 24   i    `* Re: SpaceTime2Maciej Wozniak
2 Jun 24   i     `- Re: SpaceTime1Ross Finlayson
2 Jun 24   `- Re: SpaceTime1Ross Finlayson

Haut de la page

Les messages affichés proviennent d'usenet.

NewsPortal