Re: SpaceTime

Am Sonntag000002, 02.06.2024 um 20:07 schrieb Ross Finlayson:

On 06/02/2024 10:48 AM, gharnagel wrote:

Ross Finlayson wrote:

>
Most people know that dead-reckoning isn't really a thing,
then there's wide reliance on the constancy of light-speed,
and its effectively large value.

>
>
Actually, the speed of light is really, really slow compared
to the size of the universe.  This, of course, is a proof
that tachyons MUST exist.

 That's a great idea, you'll find that most all the "-ino"
partner particles for the "-on" particles are such super-luminal
flux for the otherwise usual flow of things and flux of light.
 I don't get why optical light or nuclear radiation is called
"electromagnetic" when it doesn't interact with the fields
of electricity and magnetism at all. They're two different things.
 Lots of people rely on energy being everything or, you know,
the quantity of exchange and interchange, yet, it's only of
a particular form or exchange at any given time.
 This is that after the great "electron physics" and "ultraviolet
catastrophe" is for a "neutrino physics" and "infrared perestroika",
where both catastrophe and perestroika are the same term about
openings in singularity theories, which are multiplicity theories.
 The Aspect-type experiments and photinos represent an own sort
of re-flux about the photon sector.
 Anyways "electromagnetic radiation" isn't the same as "optical
or radionuclear radiation".
 Why light follows the geoedesy though it's massless has it
that the geodesy is still the shortest distance everywhere,
while also there's Fresnel effects in the large, one avers.
   I still take the newpaper every day, yet I've found that
the mindless feuilletons, constant pandering, and yellow
journalism of the usual boob-tube media, are not very
level-headed. There's also that many estimates of click-fraud
in Internet media advertising are on the order of 20-50 percent
or the profits, where you figure advertising successful works
out about zero-sum. If Internet media advertising were regulated
just like regular advertising, it would sort of be a thing,
and taking uncommon profits and all, looks like wind-fall.
   The "Standard Model of Particle Physics" is sort of closed,
yet there's a great and tremendous milieu of, "The Zoo",
about things like muon physics and beta decay, and why
it's a continuum mechanics again, and superluminal flux
and larger or more global and total symmetries, again is
about how it's a continuum mechanics.
 It's a continuum mechanics, ....
 

Think about this:
https://docs.google.com/presentation/d/1Ur3_giuk2l439fxUa8QHX4wTDxBEaM6lOlgVUa0cFU4/edit?usp=sharing
I take spacetime of GR as 'background with features'.
This could be electric fields, magnetism or even matter, if we regard timelike stable structures as material objects.
Spacetime is essentially continous, but not in common space it is not. Why that?
That is a question, which is easy to solve:
if matter is a timelike stable structure and we humans are material objects, too, we regard our local subset of spacetime as real and devided into objects and background (space).
But this is only the case for us in our current environment, equipped with our local axis of time.
Other worlds exist besides our own, too, where material objects there are radiation for us, (because the other world has a local axis of time, which has an angle towards ours).
TH