Re: SpaceTime

Liste des GroupesRevenir à sp relativity 
Sujet : Re: SpaceTime
De : python (at) *nospam* org.invalid (Python)
Groupes : sci.physics.relativity
Date : 04. Jun 2024, 20:26:20
Autres entêtes
Organisation : Nemoweb
Message-ID : <x-GUA3gSMM7qoJxNKwowFL7PlL0@jntp>
References : 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10
User-Agent : Nemo/0.999a
Le 04/06/2024 à 16:51, Richard Hachel a écrit :
Le 03/06/2024 à 04:12, hitlong@yahoo.com (gharnagel) a écrit :
That's the problem with the conventional view of FTL phenomena.
It comes from the Lorentz transform:
 (1) dx' = gamma(dx - v dt)
(2) dt' = gamma(dt - v dx/c^2)
 From that comes
 dx'/dt' = u' = (dx - v dt)/(dt - v dx/c^2)
 u' = (u - v)/(1 - uv/c^2)
 u' becomes infinite when u = c^2/v, and infinity is a red flag
in physics.  It means that the math becomes useless at and beyond
that point.  Physicists, who should know better, have persisted
into that real and come up with all kinds of frivolous assertions
  Absolutely.
 
like time going backwards, negative energy, causality violation
and a "reinterpretation principle."
  Yes, all this is not very normal.
 Pour ce qui est des transformations de Poincaré-Lorentz, données par le fameux mathématicien français,
qui était plus fort que Newton, Einstein et Leibniz réunis, elles conduisent directement à:
 <http://news2.nemoweb.net/jntp?HqK7tE25UvDlFWACDo6XkDlMmc8@jntp/Data.Media:1>
This is a formula that is part of standard SR (i.e. Einstein), unrelated to your idiotic rant.
You've done that before, numerous time. You want a medal for that?

Date Sujet#  Auteur
1 Jun 24 * Re: SpaceTime47gharnagel
1 Jun 24 +- Re: SpaceTime1Ross Finlayson
2 Jun 24 `* Re: SpaceTime45Thomas Heger
2 Jun 24  `* Re: SpaceTime44gharnagel
2 Jun 24   +* Re: SpaceTime42Maciej Wozniak
2 Jun 24   i`* Re: SpaceTime41gharnagel
2 Jun 24   i +- Re: SpaceTime1Maciej Wozniak
2 Jun 24   i `* Re: SpaceTime39Ross Finlayson
2 Jun 24   i  +* Re: SpaceTime34gharnagel
2 Jun 24   i  i+* Re: SpaceTime2Ross Finlayson
3 Jun 24   i  ii`- Re: SpaceTime1Thomas Heger
2 Jun 24   i  i+- Re: SpaceTime1Dmitriy Makricosta
2 Jun 24   i  i`* Re: SpaceTime30Richard Hachel
3 Jun 24   i  i `* Re: SpaceTime29gharnagel
3 Jun 24   i  i  +* Re: SpaceTime3Richard Hachel
3 Jun 24   i  i  i`* Re: SpaceTime2gharnagel
3 Jun 24   i  i  i `- Re: SpaceTime1Ross Finlayson
3 Jun 24   i  i  +* Re: SpaceTime4Richard Hachel
3 Jun 24   i  i  i+- Re: SpaceTime1Ross Finlayson
3 Jun 24   i  i  i`* Re: SpaceTime2gharnagel
3 Jun 24   i  i  i `- Re: SpaceTime1Hank Bogdán
3 Jun 24   i  i  `* Re: SpaceTime21Ross Finlayson
3 Jun 24   i  i   +- Re: SpaceTime1Ross Finlayson
3 Jun 24   i  i   `* Re: SpaceTime19gharnagel
3 Jun 24   i  i    +* Re: SpaceTime7Ross Finlayson
3 Jun 24   i  i    i+* Re: SpaceTime5Ross Finlayson
3 Jun 24   i  i    ii`* Re: SpaceTime4Ross Finlayson
3 Jun 24   i  i    ii `* Re: SpaceTime3Ross Finlayson
3 Jun 24   i  i    ii  `* Re: SpaceTime2Ross Finlayson
5 Jun 24   i  i    ii   `- Re: SpaceTime1Ross Finlayson
3 Jun 24   i  i    i`- Re: SpaceTime1Maciej Wozniak
4 Jun 24   i  i    `* Re: SpaceTime11Richard Hachel
4 Jun 24   i  i     `* Re: SpaceTime10Python
5 Jun 24   i  i      +- Re: SpaceTime1Richard Hachel
5 Jun 24   i  i      `* Re: SpaceTime8gharnagel
5 Jun 24   i  i       +* Re: SpaceTime3Maciej Wozniak
5 Jun 24   i  i       i`* Re: SpaceTime2gharnagel
5 Jun 24   i  i       i `- Re: SpaceTime1Maciej Wozniak
5 Jun 24   i  i       +- Re: SpaceTime1Richard Hachel
5 Jun 24   i  i       `* Re: SpaceTime3Richard Hachel
5 Jun 24   i  i        `* Re: SpaceTime2gharnagel
5 Jun 24   i  i         `- Re: SpaceTime1gharnagel
2 Jun 24   i  `* Re: SpaceTime4Maciej Wozniak
2 Jun 24   i   `* Re: SpaceTime3Ross Finlayson
2 Jun 24   i    `* Re: SpaceTime2Maciej Wozniak
2 Jun 24   i     `- Re: SpaceTime1Ross Finlayson
2 Jun 24   `- Re: SpaceTime1Ross Finlayson

Haut de la page

Les messages affichés proviennent d'usenet.

NewsPortal