Sujet : Re: Is Light Stationary?
De : ross.a.finlayson (at) *nospam* gmail.com (Ross Finlayson)
Groupes : sci.physics.relativityDate : 06. Jun 2024, 04:25:56
Autres entêtes
Message-ID : <fN-cnVzVdvZysfz7nZ2dnZfqn_adnZ2d@giganews.com>
References : 1
User-Agent : Mozilla/5.0 (X11; Linux x86_64; rv:38.0) Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/38.6.0
On 06/05/2024 03:28 PM, TRS-90 wrote:
If the speed of light is the invariant, could it be that everything else is moving and that light is somehow stationary?
>
From any given perspective the image contained is always
receding at c, buts that's from all given perspectives,
some "Light Speed Rest Frame" theory.
Two images meet and pass so light's not stationary,
and it's not stationery, it's though just a way to
frame GR instead of SR in terms of what's "absolute"
and what's "relative", in relative terms.
It's not necessarily very practical, though it's a
sort of theoretical artifice, and relates to otherwise
models of separation, it's just an idea in the
abstraction of terms, perspective.
It is that, then, yet, that's what it is.