Re: Space and spacetime

W dniu 21.06.2024 o 16:14, gharnagel pisze:

Maciej Wozniak wrote:

>
W dniu 20.06.2024 o 18:01, gharnagel pisze:

>
Maciej Wozniak wrote:

>
OK, trash - an observer going with c/2 through
Solar system is going to measure the length of
a day. What is the prediction of the physics
of your idiot guru for the result? No precision
better than 1% needed.
A "day"?  What is a "day"?

 

A day is a day, Harrie.

 No, it's not.  Wozzie deleted where I explained that

Put your explaination straight into your
dumb, fanatic ass, where it belongs.
If I said "3 days ago" you wouldn't
ask what I meant, would you? You're
not THAT stupid, are you?
You're just pretending stupider than
you are to dodge the question. Well,
a hint for you: how was "second"
defined in the  physics of your
idiot guru? I mean THAT day.

No, I don't.
You didn't reply, so that implies you agree with what I wrote.

 

No, Harrie, it doesn't. And I don't agree.

 Then you should have replied.

Fuck you, Harrie, and fuck your opinion
of what I should do.

I'm sure you can prove LT are correct where they
are correct; evan such an idiot should be able to
manage such a task.

I doubt if you could :-)

>
Prove that something is valid when it is valid?

 Of course.  How does one KNOW that it's valid

I don't have to know if it's valid to know
that it is valid if/when it is valid.
"It is valid in its apply range" is
a simple truism, Harrie.  You're an idiot
so you don't realize that.

which explodes Wozzie's "proof."
So he has just admitted that he lied.

>
No,I didn't.
Yeah, you did.  You are either demented or you're a liar.

 

No, I didn't. You are both dementad and a liar.

 I'm just an unbiased observer watching Wozzie squirm when he

And then lying and slandering, as imudently
as stupidly.

Even such a piece of lying
shit as Harrie is can't lie 100% of time,
but it still can lie most of the time.
Wozzie lies ALL of the time.  And he just did it again.

 

Oh, did I? You DO lie 100% of time, Harrie?

 See?  Wozzie did it again!  He said I lied MOST of the time

I said you don't lie 100% of time and you called me a liar...

One that rejects an obvious lie of a religious
maniac insisting that The Nature itself is
speaking to him and his idiot gurus.

 Wozzie appears to be oblivious to finer sensibilities.  I speak
metaphorically

And I speak directly - you lie like a fanatic
idiot you are.

That's the specialization of dealing
with information and its various constructs.
No way I'm an invincible expert, of course...
we could discuss, if you weren't such an
arrogant not-even-layman idiot.
Nice example of his prejudice again :-))

>
Just some sad truth, Harrie.

 I'm afraid Wozzie is resistant to truth.  Part of his problem
when dealing with physics questions is that he appears to be
mathematically incompetent.

Speaking of mathematics - it's always good to remind
that your bunch of idiots had to announce its oldest
part false, as it didn't want to fit the madness
of your insane guru.

If LT were designed for an ether theory
the "obvious" c+v=c interpretation of The
Shit's worshippers can't be that obvios,
don't you think, Harrie, poor halfbrain?

 Wozzie can't help himself from scatology and denigration.
His parents never brought him up right, never washed his mouth
out with soap when he behaved rudely.
 Anyway, his little diatribe makes no sense.  He seems to believe
that "c+v=c" is an "interpretation" rather than a mathematical
derivation.

Tell me, poor halfbrain, was the RELATIVISTIC
formula of velocity adding a part of Lorentz's
ETHER theory?
Yes or no?
  Refer back to the quote by Heinlein.