Re: The failure of the unified field theory means general relativity fails.

On 06/23/2024 01:48 AM, J. J. Lodder wrote:

Ross Finlayson <ross.a.finlayson@gmail.com> wrote:
>

On 06/22/2024 02:26 AM, J. J. Lodder wrote:

LaurenceClarkCrossen <clzb93ynxj@att.net> wrote:
>

The formula uses the speed of light for the force of gravity, employing
an electromagnetic assumption shared by Gerber and Einstein, among other
electromagnetic formulas used by both.

>
More nonsense.
The speed of light equals 1
and it doesn't appear in any formula of physics,
(in the right units)
>
Jan
>

>
That's in a mathematics with only numbers between 0 and 1, though.
>
Or, "only numbers only between only 0 and only 1".

>
???
In natural units one non-trivial unit remains,
taken as enery, or time for example.
>
Very large numbers can and do occur.
The kg/Hz for example is quite large,
as is the age of the universe, in seconds,
>
Jan
>

There's that's "meters", in space, ranges 0, ..., +-infinity,
and "seconds", in time, ranges 0, ..., infinity,
so, "m/s", range 0, ..., +- infinity.
Then one avers that "in relativity theory the mass/energy
equivalency after e = mc^2 and the L-principle c = const O(10^8)"
results that as v -> c that e -> m * O(infinity), as c-v -> 0.
Yet, the kinetic energy equation which has a Taylor series
whose first term is mc^2, has also the rest of the terms.
These are attached with their units, which are not just
joules, anymore.
Then, in any theory like "abstract universe with an instantaneous
geodesy everywhere", i.e. that c_g > c, then "natural units of c"
is missing all those numbers because in "natural units of c",
c_g > c = c, "infinity".
So, "natural units are like a 1 infinity".