Re: A quick proof of the inconcistency of the physics of your idiot guru

Maciej Wozniak wrote:

>
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Second
As seen, the definition of second loved so
much to be invoked by relativistic morons -
wasn't valid in the time when their idiot guru
lived and mumbled. Up to 1960 it was ordinary
1/86400 of a solar day, also in physics.

Which is completely irrelevant.

Now: an observer moving with c/2 wrt
solar system is measuring the length
of solar day. What is the result predicted
by the Einsteinian physics?
One prediction is - 99766. From the
postulates. The second prediction is -
86400. From definition.
And similiarly with the prediction of
a measurement of a meridian.

Wozzie inadvertently misspelled "similarly"
to include the word "liar" within it.  He
knows that he is that.
What an ignoramus is Wozzie!  He somehow
deludes himself into believing that the
fast observer's measurements mean anything
at all to what is measured on earth, as if
the observer could change anything there.
“There are basically two groups of people.
People who accomplish things, and people who
claim to have accomplished things.  The first
group is less crowded.” – Mark Twain
Wozzie is in the second group, which includes
many delusional fools like himself.

Thank you for your attention, poor
relativistic fanatics, have a nice day.

Thank you for not posting any more of your
delusional nonsense.