Re: In relativity "s" is for "spin"

W dniu 29.06.2024 o 10:45, Mikko pisze:

On 2024-06-28 18:29:02 +0000, LaurenceClarkCrossen said:
 

In relativity "s" is for "spin"
>
For everyone's edification, I hereby share relativity explaining how
light is affected twice as much as everything else, flouting Galileo &
Eotvos.
>
"Are Photons Massless or Massive?"
>
= "Since the photon is a spin-1 particle, according to this new
equation, Eg^2= s^2p^2c^2 + mi^2c^4 , it follows that, s = 2 , for the
photon. In Section 10, it will become clear when we analysis the motion
of star light (electromagnetic waves) that this fact that for a photon
we must have, s = 2 , if Newtonian gravitation is to stand-up to the
eclipse measurements of the Solar gravitational bending of star light.
This fact on its it own—i.e., the fact that for a photon we must have, s
= 2 ; explains the missing factor “2” in the gravitational bending of
light angle in Newtonian gravitation. We take this as a notable
achievement of the theory of the Curved Spacetime Dirac Equations
presented in the readings [14]-[16], in that this theory has been able
to furnish a missing piece of a great puzzle. It is an achievement in
much the same way that Professor Paul Dirac [17] [18]’s equation
furnished the puzzle of the gyromagnetic ratio of the electron (see e.g.
[16] on how the Dirac equation solved the
gyromagnetic ratio of the electron)."

 Relativity is a theory about nature.

It's mostly about clocks and observers, which
are out of your "nature" tale, poor halfbrain.
  It does not define language

conventions
such as meaning of "s".

Instead it's mumbling mystically.