Re: The purpose of science

Maciej Wozniak wrote:

>
W dniu 03.07.2024 o 20:20, gharnagel pisze:

>
Maciej Wozniak wrote:

>
W dniu 03.07.2024 o 19:21, gharnagel pisze:

>

 >> > Maciej Wozniak wrote:

>
See, Harrie - I'm a professional in the
field,

>
The "field"?  Information?  No, Woz, the field you're
trying to define is science, not information.

>
I'm not trying to define either science,
or any field.

>
Not so, Woz.

>
Yes so, Har.

You're not being honest, Woz.  Just "'cause I said so" is not
a valid answer.  I gave you a valid answer why you were indeed
trying to define science and you left it out of your non-reply,
so here it is again:
"You wrote "Science is setting [truth], "not discovering it"
I wrote that your claim is equivalent to "Science = setting
truth."  When I say A = B, I'm defining A to be the same as B.
You can twist and turn all you want, but
https://www.dictionary.com/browse/definition
Definition: "the act of defining, or of making something definite,
distinct, or clear"
Which is EXACTLY what you were doing.
“The truth is incontrovertible.  Malice may attack it, ignorance may
deride it, but in the end, there it is.” -- Winston Churchill
So please stop the childish nonsense and act like a responsible
adult.