Sujet : Re: Spacetime
De : hitlong (at) *nospam* yahoo.com (gharnagel)
Groupes : sci.physics.relativityDate : 05. Jul 2024, 13:25:34
Autres entêtes
Organisation : novaBBS
Message-ID : <66338588d7c6c93d2a18a48411575d47@www.novabbs.com>
References : 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10
User-Agent : Rocksolid Light
Thomas Heger wrote:
>
Am Donnerstag000004, 04.07.2024 um 18:39 schrieb gharnagel:
>
Thomas Heger wrote:
>
One unusual assumption is: points may have features and more than
three
dimensions.
>
I think points are nonexistent. They are a mental invention to
express
geometrical concepts, just like numbers were invented to express
mathematical concepts.
>
Sure: a point is actually meant as coordinate in space, hence not really
real in a coordinate free space.
And space is coordinate-free.
But real things are usually meant to consist of something.
>
If spacetime is real and a smooth continuum, than spacetime would
consists of 'pointlike elements'.
Which is why it's not real.
If so, we need to build particles out of these 'points', if we like to
combine GR and QM.
>
This sounds strange, to say the least, but is actually quite good,
because it allows such things as 'big bang' or pair-creation.
Fields seem to work okay.
Then we need something, that could eventually behave the way, that
particles could be a substructur under a certain perspective.
>
I meant that a certain type of quaternions would match the discription
and wrote my 'book' about this idea.
Quaternions are mathematical concepts, not real.
I wanted something different than one of the usual
'materialistic'
concepts, to which string-theory actually belongs.
>
That's where ALL of physics IS.
>
Sure,
>
So you agree that your idea is not physics? Hmmm.
>
no, not quite.
>
It's physics, but I'm not a physicist.
>
That is similar to other professions, say medicine:
So you want a nonprofessional to operate on you?
I'm not a professional, but that doesn't mean, that my remedy does not
heal.
>
...
>
TH
We'll have to agree to disagree. I think you like your idea too much.
"4. Try not to get overly attached to a hypothesis just because
it’s yours. It’s only a way station in the pursuit of knowledge.
Ask yourself why you like the idea. Compare it fairly with the
alternatives. See if you can find reasons for rejecting it. If you
don’t, others will." -- Carl Sagan