Re: Spacetime

On Sat, 6 Jul 2024 14:43:52 (UTC), Maciej Wozniak wrote:

>
W dniu 06.07.2024 o 15:29, gharnagel pisze:

>
Maciej Wozniak wrote:

>
W dniu 05.07.2024 o 18:37, gharnagel pisze:

>
Only a poor D-K idiot like Wozzie-idiot wouldn't
understand the answer I gave:

>
Who was asking you whether a number (the smallest
prime)  is  a physical object? The question was
if it exists.

>
Wozzie seems to have trouble with definitions.

>
What are definitions, Harrie?

I posted the definition of definitions and Wozzie-liar
deleted it and then asks for the definition.  He really
has some serious mental issues, honesty being a big one.

Say honestly, poor trash: if you asked me
"do dogs exist?" and I answerred "They
don't exist as cats" - would you accept that
as the answer to your question?

Both cats and dogs have physical existence, so Wozzie
is being dishonest again.  He doesn't attack the root
of the problem because he's incapable of critical
thought.

That's typical of a poor D-K idiot.  So what is the
difference between existence and physicality?

D-K Wozzie refuses to answer the question at the root
of his ... question, which he only asked to try and trap
an unsuspecting person into an embarrassing dilemma.
But we all know how his devious and deceitful mind works.

Well - if you answerred the question
"does the smallest prime number exist" -
maybe you'd get some clue about that
difference.
Or maybe not. You're really, really
stupid, Harrie.

Cats exist in the physical world but numbers don't, so
Wozzie-pig will just be left oinking, lying and slandering
again.  The basic question is, do nonphysical things have
existence?  Wozzie won't answer that because he's dishonest.
And stupid.