Re: Spacetime

On Sun, 7 Jul 2024 14:11:44 (UTC), Maciej Wozniak wrote:

>
W dniu 07.07.2024 o 15:02, gharnagel pisze:

>
On Sun, 7 Jul 2024 5:42:59 (UTC), Maciej Wozniak wrote:

>

 >> > W dniu 06.07.2024 o 23:41, gharnagel pisze:

>
so Wozzie-pig keeps deleting so he will just be left oinking,
lying and slandering again and again.  The basic question is,
do nonphysical things have existence?

>
No, trash, mistaken as usual.

>
Sorry, oinker, you're trying to avoid responsibility for defining
"exist."

>
Right after you define "defining", poor trash.

I already did that.  So Wozzie-oinker just keeps going in circles.
I suppose he believes that makes him a big wheel.

Your pseudophilosophy is no way basic

>
No philosophy involved, only a simple definition.

>
So, by [your] "definition" (sic!) - the smallest
prime doesn't exist. Right, poor halfbrain?

I'm glad Wozzie has finally got it.  According to a physical definition
for existence, numbers don't exist.  Wozzie seems to be excessively
autistic.

BTW, can you point experiments confirming
your pseudophilosophical dillema to be basic?

Philosophy isn't an experimental discipline, so Wozzie-oinker is just
trying to obfuscate again.  He routinely deletes my answers to his
questions and pretends I didn't answer them, proving his fundamental
dishonesty.  He must have been trying to get me to say that prime
numbers are real, or name the smallest one, so he could insist that
I show him one in the universe, or if I said "3" he would argue that
I must prove that "2" isn't; or if I said "2" he would argue that I
must prove that "3" isn't.  Wozzie-oinker is a deceitful, small-souled
little pig, "a tale told by an idiot, full of sound and fury,
signifying nothing."