Re: Langevin's paradox again

W dniu 12.07.2024 o 14:03, Paul.B.Andersen pisze:

Den 11.07.2024 14:56, skrev Richard Hachel:

Le 11/07/2024 à 14:36, "Paul.B.Andersen" a écrit :

Den 11.07.2024 02:02, skrev Richard Hachel:

>

Yet B ages 9.18 years while A ages 22.63 y.

>
Which is the only result SR can give.

 What's the point with writing 5 responses where you don't
address anything in the post you are responding to?
 

Quite.
We know that your "theory" is falsified and gives the wrong results.

 

No. Not MINE.

 May I remind you:
 | Den 27.03.2024 07:23, skrev Richard Hachel:
|> Le 26/03/2024 à 21:45, "Paul B. Andersen" a écrit :
|>>
|>> Are you claiming that the real speed of the protons in the LHC is
|>>   Vr = 6927⋅c ?
|>
|> Absolutely.
|>
|> That's what I said.
 | Den 27.03.2024 07:23, skrev Richard Hachel:
|> Le 26/03/2024 à 21:45, "Paul B. Andersen" a écrit :
|>>
|>> You are claiming that the protons are going around the ≈ 27 km ring
|>> ≈ 78 million times per second.
|>> The real value is ≈ 11.25 thousand times per second.
|>
|> CERN physicists are doing their job.
|> We have accustomed them to working at classic relativistic speed.
|> So it makes sense that they find the speed they expect.
|> I tell them that the proton rotates 78 million times per second,
  It is experimentally proved that no accelerator would work
if charged particles didn't behave _exactly_ as predicted by SR.

A very impudent lie, as expected from
relativistic scum.

Some of the experimental evidence that fail to falsify SR:
https://paulba.no/paper/index.html

And in the meantime in the real world - forbidden
by your insane church improper clocks keep
measuring improper t'=t in improper seconds.