Re: Langevin's paradox again

W dniu 14.07.2024 o 20:36, Paul.B.Andersen pisze:

Den 12.07.2024 15:44, skrev Richard Hachel:

Le 12/07/2024 à 13:58, "Paul.B.Andersen" a écrit :

>
It is experimentally proved that no accelerator would work
if charged particles didn't behave _exactly_ as predicted by SR.
>
Doctor Richard Hachel's theory predicts that protons behave
very differently from what SR predicts.

>
No.
>

Doctor Richard Hachel's theory is experimentally falsified.

>
No.

  To test a theory, you must calculate what the theory
predicts will be measured in an experiment.
 Then you do the experiment, and see if the values
read of the instrument are in accordance with the prediction
within the precision of the measurement.

No need for that, of course, in the
case of the mumble your idiot guru; as
his predictions deny each other - at
least one of them must be denied by the
measurement...
Not even talking about - how primitive
and naive Popper's tales of "falsification"
are.