Re: Relativistic aberration

On Mon, 15 Jul 2024 17:08:01 +0000, Richard Hachel wrote:

>
Le 15/07/2024 à 18:12, hitlong@yahoo.com (gharnagel) a écrit :

>
On Mon, 15 Jul 2024 12:55:23 +0000, Richard Hachel wrote:

>
To=(x/c).sqrt(1+2c²/ax)
>
No, he is a relativist like Hachel, and uses a different geometry

for

space and time problems.

>
And wrong.

>
 Prove?

It is incumbent on you to prove that they describe the real universe.
You haven't even tried to do that.

Example: what is the formula giving the instantaneous speed of

uniformly

accelerated objects?
Voi/c=[1+c²/2ax]^-(1/2)
This formula does not exist either in Newton or Einstein.

>
And does not describe anything in the universe.

>
 No, YOU, you say that this formula does not describe anything in the
universe.

Do you disagree?  Prove it.

Another example: transformations into rotating frames of reference.
>
>

<http://news2.nemoweb.net/jntp?_hiIkN_NB6Jm2XOJZeHK7Fy9L2E@jntp/Data.Media:1>

>
These transformations do not exist neither in Newton nor in

Einstein.

>
R.H.

>
And do not describe anything in the universe.

>
 Idem. YOU, you say that...
>
 R.H.

As a physicist, I do say that.  But physicists have been wrong before,
so prove
that I'm wrong.