Re: Approximately 300,000 km/s With Respect To What?

Le 22/07/2024 à 07:26, Thomas Heger a écrit :

 What? ? ?
 In Germany we have a constitutional civil right which is called 'freedom of science'.
 As my critique of Einstein's text is strictly scientific, it should be covered by our constitution.
 My guesses about the person Einstein are protected by another constitutional right, which is called' freedom of expression'.
 Partially this critique is also meant as scientific, because history is actually a science.
 Btw: what if Einstein was really a disinformation agent? ? ?
 Wouldn't that be interesting in this forum, which is named after his invention?
 Therefore, some speculations should be allowed. Einstein himself shouldn't care, because he's dead now for almost 70 years.

Einstein was an agent of disinformation, but not in the scientific sense, rather in the political sense.
His goal (that is to say those who created him) was more to destroy Poincaré, terribly jealous (Einstein said at the end of his life that he had lied by saying that he had not read Poincaré and that he did not know him, he revealed that on the contrary, he had read him, and that he had been captivated by the power of thought and the works of this man). Einstein, however, never cites Poincaré in his works, which is frankly abnormal and deliberate. We have the same thing today in France with a professor who wrote a book "the origins of the theory of relativity". The author cites dozens of people (Galileo, Lorentz, Einstein, Larmor, etc.), dozens...
Not once does he cite Poincaré. Poincaré never existed. It's becoming surreal. Even in the smallest footnote paragraph, Poincaré is not cited. Many saw it as an attitude of voluntary censorship by a French person against a French person. All this is obviously very abnormal, especially since W=mc² is Poincaré. The expansion of chronotropy is Poincaré. The correct transformations of Galilean relativity (Lorentz) are Poincaré.
Note that Einstein was nationalized American. It's not trivial either. He was no longer European, but American. He will say himself: I hate the German people. Einstein was a traitor to Germany
in the sense that he lies by omission. He does not say that Nazism in Germany was the work of the Americans. He does not say "the Americans were odious, they pushed Europe into civil war, they financed Germany to attack France and Russia, then they wanted to occupy and colonize half of the world." Europe".
Einstein doesn't say that. He says he hates the Germans for what they did to the Jews, but does not explain who ordered and who financed the destruction of Europe from within.
Last thing: Einstein deviated Poincaré's current of thought much more than he carried it further. In everything that relativistic physicists added AFTER Poincaré, almost everything is false.
R.H.