Re: Relativistic definition

Liste des GroupesRevenir à sp relativity 
Sujet : Re: Relativistic definition
De : mikko.levanto (at) *nospam* iki.fi (Mikko)
Groupes : sci.physics.relativity
Date : 24. Jul 2024, 11:03:55
Autres entêtes
Organisation : -
Message-ID : <v7qg1r$1m7i4$1@dont-email.me>
References : 1
User-Agent : Unison/2.2
On 2024-07-23 15:44:59 +0000, Richard Hachel said:

Here is a sentence from Dr. Hachel with which physicists do not agree at all.
It's a shame.
When an individual disagrees with another individual on a scientific theory or fact, it would be normal to ask the other party to sit down and explain why they are behaving in an outlandish-looking manner. , and why it "thinks differently".
This would be a proof of logic and human coherence.
 "If two mobiles, one in simple Galilean movement,
the other in uniformly accelerated movement with a start at rest,
 cross an identical space, in identical observable times,
then their proper times will be equal."
That sentence contains an undefined term "Galilean movement".
Therefore no agreement is possible.
--
Mikko

Date Sujet#  Auteur
23 Jul 24 * Relativistic definition9Richard Hachel
23 Jul 24 +* Re: Relativistic definition5JanPB
24 Jul 24 i`* Re: Relativistic definition4Richard Hachel
24 Jul 24 i `* Re: Relativistic definition3Paul.B.Andersen
24 Jul 24 i  `* Re: Relativistic definition2Richard Hachel
24 Jul 24 i   `- Re: Relativistic definition1Elick Tzagadaev
24 Jul 24 `* Re: Relativistic definition3Mikko
24 Jul 24  `* Re: Relativistic definition2Richard Hachel
26 Jul 24   `- Re: Relativistic definition1Mikko

Haut de la page

Les messages affichés proviennent d'usenet.

NewsPortal