Re: Approximately 300,000 km/s With Respect To What?

Am Mittwoch000024, 24.07.2024 um 11:39 schrieb J. J. Lodder:

Thomas Heger <ttt_heg@web.de> wrote:
 

Am Dienstag000023, 23.07.2024 um 09:33 schrieb J. J. Lodder:

Mikko <mikko.levanto@iki.fi> wrote:
>

On 2024-07-22 05:33:26 +0000, Thomas Heger said:
>

Am Sonntag000021, 21.07.2024 um 13:36 schrieb Maciej Wozniak:

W dniu 21.07.2024 o 12:40, Python pisze:

Le 21/07/2024 à 09:03, Thomas Heger a écrit :

Am Samstag000020, 20.07.2024 um 16:08 schrieb Python:
...

The number of errors in einstein's paper is also extremely large,
hence that 'system' would need permanent control over large parts
of science.
>
Also a mechanism for sanctions against dissidents would be
useful.
>
But for what reasons would any system take such an amount of
efforts???
>
Certainly something not very beneficial, because otherwise we
would be told about it.

>
Even as fond you are to pathetically stupid "theories" (growing
Earth, Hitler is a British spy, etc.) you seem to realize,
somewhat, how stupid your claims are?
>
There is a far simpler way to explain everything
- There are no significant mistakes in Einstein's article

>
This is actually a counterfactual 'sanction'!
>
You didn't even mention my 'annotated version of SRT' and the 400+
errors I have found in Einstein's paper.
>
Here it is:
>
https://drive.google.com/file/d/1RkhX-B5u7X4ga0QH-C53RddjQGctZVdo/view
>
If you think, that I made 400+ errors myself, than please show at least
a single one.

>
Come on, Thomas. A lot of yours claims there has been extensively
debunked here, by me and others.
>

>
>
Whatever you say - Poincare had enough wit
to understand how idiotic rejecting Euclid
would be, and he has written it clearly
enough for anyone able to read (even if not
clearly enough for you, poor stinker).

>
Poincare was a mathematician and a very good one.
>
He wandered into physics, because he was dealing with the Lorentz
transformation and with Maxwells equations.

>
So you got that wrong too. (can't you ever get anything right?)
Poincaré, like Einstein, was an engineer by training.

>
Einstein was actually teacher from training.

 More nonsense.
Einstein graduated from the ETH Zurich as an engineer, period,
just like any other engineer.
They didn't have 'teaching only' degrees. [1]

I have read, that Einstein got a degree as teacher for physics.
But, as a matter of fact, I cannot proof this and it is also of little interest for me.

What is true is that Einstein prefered the general physics courses,
and that he avoided specialised subjects as much as possible.
He was, and wanted to be a generalist.
It seems plausible that he got his job at the patent office
precisely because of that.

I have regarded it as questionable, that stateless foreigners could work in an 'Amt', where usually only born citizens could work (because the Patentamt was security critical).
My conclusion from this was, that Einstein WAS in fact born in Swizzerland and his CV therefore a fake.
Why Swizzerland did that and why they tried to derail common science, that is a riddle for me.
Possibly the Swiss had developed something useful, like a time machine or device to synthesize Gold, which they wanted to have exclusively.

That Poincaré was an engineer was new for me.

 This is typical of you. You proclaim all kinds of things
without bothering for a moment to look at readily available sources
for even a little amount of fact check,

Well, you always have some gaps in what you know.
About Poincaré and his personal life I have actually very few informations.
But what exactly are you trying to prove with this´?
...
TH