Re: Relativistic definition

Liste des GroupesRevenir à sp relativity 
Sujet : Re: Relativistic definition
De : mikko.levanto (at) *nospam* iki.fi (Mikko)
Groupes : sci.physics.relativity
Date : 26. Jul 2024, 09:56:19
Autres entêtes
Organisation : -
Message-ID : <v7vkr3$2ock0$1@dont-email.me>
References : 1 2 3
User-Agent : Unison/2.2
On 2024-07-24 11:28:12 +0000, Richard Hachel said:

Le 24/07/2024 à 11:03, Mikko a écrit :

On 2024-07-23 15:44:59 +0000, Richard Hachel said:

"If two mobiles, one in simple Galilean movement,
the other in uniformly accelerated movement with a start at rest,
cross an identical space, in identical observable times,
then their proper times will be equal."

 That sentence contains an undefined term "Galilean movement".
Therefore no agreement is possible.
 Mikko
 Vous avez raison.
 Il est plus précis de dire :
"If two mobiles, one in simple uniform Galilean movement,
the other in uniformly accelerated movement with a start at rest,
cross an identical space, in identical observable times,
then their proper times will be equal."
Not much better than the first attempt. The term "Galilean movenent"
is still undefined.
--
Mikko

Date Sujet#  Auteur
23 Jul 24 * Relativistic definition9Richard Hachel
23 Jul 24 +* Re: Relativistic definition5JanPB
24 Jul 24 i`* Re: Relativistic definition4Richard Hachel
24 Jul 24 i `* Re: Relativistic definition3Paul.B.Andersen
24 Jul 24 i  `* Re: Relativistic definition2Richard Hachel
24 Jul 24 i   `- Re: Relativistic definition1Elick Tzagadaev
24 Jul 24 `* Re: Relativistic definition3Mikko
24 Jul 24  `* Re: Relativistic definition2Richard Hachel
26 Jul 24   `- Re: Relativistic definition1Mikko

Haut de la page

Les messages affichés proviennent d'usenet.

NewsPortal