Re: Energy?

gharnagel <hitlong@yahoo.com> wrote:

On Wed, 31 Jul 2024 20:43:47 +0000, Maciej Wozniak wrote:

>
W dniu 31.07.2024 o 17:30, gharnagel pisze:

>
On Wed, 31 Jul 2024 8:30:15 +0000, Maciej Wozniak wrote:

>
And thus - conservation of energy, your alleged
"law of nature" is really a simple language truism
(and it's not a critique, just stating the fact).

>
So Wozzie doesn't believe energy conservation is a
law?

>
Herrie, poor halfbrain, you're free to
believe  The Nature herself speaking to Chosen
Ones and reveal Her Laws for repeating to
little ones; but  only  idiots like you
can believe  such crap.

 
So eighth-brain Wozzie, by his own admission,
doesn't believe in conservation of energy.
Why would that be?  Perhaps it's because he
doesn't believe in anything?
 
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Nihilism
 

With the definition above - your "law" is
a simple truism, and some  fanatic idiots
screaming "NOOOOOO!!!!" change nothing.

 
Wozzie-idiot, the disinformation engineer,
doesn't understand science.  Of COURSE
conservation of energy is falsifiable!  It
can be determined by making measurements.
So far, it hasn't been falsified.  Supposed
problems have arisen in the past and were
put to rest by finding new forms of energy
or new particles.

So it is not falsifiable by experiments.
It can only be falsified -by failure-
to find a new and better theory
of what energy is. (in which it is again conserved)

Of course such a situation is impossible,
for such a failure to find a better thery
could just be due to our collective stupidity.
We can never be sure that it cannot exist,

Jan