Re: Relativistic aberration

Liste des GroupesRevenir à sp relativity 
Sujet : Re: Relativistic aberration
De : r.hachel (at) *nospam* wanadou.fr (Richard Hachel)
Groupes : sci.physics.relativity
Date : 03. Aug 2024, 20:40:09
Autres entêtes
Organisation : Nemoweb
Message-ID : <_I3ZlloZc60bFwdtoqRVrp9tZIQ@jntp>
References : 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10
User-Agent : Nemo/0.999a
Le 03/08/2024 à 19:43, "Paul.B.Andersen" a écrit :
Does all this nonsensical babble change the fact that when the
distance to the star we see in the telescope is 15000 light years,
then the light we see left the star 15000 years ago?
 Paul
Paul, Paul, I beg you not to talk nonsense.
For that, there is already Python. He is completely crazy, and this forum does not need you to make him even crazier.
I will try to explain better, but I think that, on your side, there is a refusal to drink.
The star is 15,000 light years away.
It is an astronomical measurement.
Breathe, blow.
Don't tell me you don't understand this.
In the other frame of reference, that of the rocket, the star is 41,000 light years away.
However, the two are conjunct, and in the same solar system.
And yet the star is not at the same distance from the two observers.
So far, are you following, do you understand?
Can I now go further if yes, do you understand?
For the moment I beg you to believe me, I have not said anything shocking, and I am simply applying the evidence stated by a genius of mathematics and world physics, Henri Poincaré.
Look here at the drawing I made.
We see two joint observers.
But one passes at Vo=0.8c.
Point M is not seen at the same distance, nor in the same place for the two observers.
This is the ABC of the theory.
Breathe, blow, so far so good?
If someone does not understand, let them say so.
If everyone understands, I will go further and explain that this measurement of space is NOT the time taken by light to go from A to B in the frame of reference of B (nor of A) but only of C (neutral observer placed far, transversely, and at an equal geometric distance from A and B in the frame of reference of AB.
R.H.
Date Sujet#  Auteur
14 Jul 24 * Relativistic aberration213Richard Hachel
15 Jul 24 +* Re: Relativistic aberration106gharnagel
15 Jul 24 i+* Re: Relativistic aberration3Maciej Wozniak
15 Jul 24 ii`* Re: Relativistic aberration2Richard Hachel
15 Jul 24 ii `- Re: Relativistic aberration1Maciej Wozniak
15 Jul 24 i`* Re: Relativistic aberration102Richard Hachel
15 Jul 24 i `* Re: Relativistic aberration101gharnagel
15 Jul 24 i  `* Re: Relativistic aberration100Richard Hachel
15 Jul 24 i   `* Re: Relativistic aberration99gharnagel
15 Jul 24 i    +- Re: Relativistic aberration1Maciej Wozniak
15 Jul 24 i    +- Re: Relativistic aberration1Richard Hachel
15 Jul 24 i    `* Re: Relativistic aberration96Richard Hachel
15 Jul 24 i     `* Re: Relativistic aberration95gharnagel
15 Jul 24 i      `* Re: Relativistic aberration94Richard Hachel
15 Jul 24 i       `* Re: Relativistic aberration93gharnagel
15 Jul 24 i        +* Re: Relativistic aberration91Richard Hachel
16 Jul 24 i        i`* Re: Relativistic aberration90gharnagel
16 Jul 24 i        i `* Re: Relativistic aberration89Richard Hachel
16 Jul 24 i        i  `* Re: Relativistic aberration88gharnagel
17 Jul 24 i        i   `* Re: Relativistic aberration87Thomas Heger
17 Jul 24 i        i    `* Re: Relativistic aberration86gharnagel
17 Jul 24 i        i     +* Re: Relativistic aberration78Maciej Wozniak
17 Jul 24 i        i     i`* Re: Relativistic aberration77gharnagel
17 Jul 24 i        i     i `* Re: Relativistic aberration76Maciej Wozniak
18 Jul 24 i        i     i  +* Re: Relativistic aberration3gharnagel
18 Jul 24 i        i     i  i+- Re: Relativistic aberration1Reign Batura
31 Jul 24 i        i     i  i`- Re: Relativistic aberration1gharnagel
10 Aug 24 i        i     i  `* Re: Relativistic aberration72gharnagel
10 Aug 24 i        i     i   `* Re: Relativistic aberration71Maciej Wozniak
11 Aug 24 i        i     i    `* Re: Relativistic aberration70gharnagel
11 Aug 24 i        i     i     +- Re: Relativistic aberration1Kalakos Angelopoulos
11 Aug 24 i        i     i     `* Re: Relativistic aberration68gharnagel
11 Aug 24 i        i     i      +- Re: Relativistic aberration1Szűcs Kővári
11 Aug 24 i        i     i      `* Re: Relativistic aberration66gharnagel
11 Aug 24 i        i     i       `* Re: Relativistic aberration65gharnagel
11 Aug 24 i        i     i        +* Re: Relativistic aberration5Ross Finlayson
11 Aug 24 i        i     i        i`* Re: Relativistic aberration4Ross Finlayson
11 Aug 24 i        i     i        i `* Re: Relativistic aberration3Python
12 Aug 24 i        i     i        i  `* Re: Relativistic aberration2gharnagel
12 Aug 24 i        i     i        i   `- Re: Relativistic aberration1Ross Finlayson
12 Aug 24 i        i     i        `* Re: Relativistic aberration59Maciej Wozniak
12 Aug 24 i        i     i         `* Re: Relativistic aberration58gharnagel
12 Aug 24 i        i     i          `* Re: Relativistic aberration57Maciej Wozniak
12 Aug 24 i        i     i           +* Re: Relativistic aberration4Python
12 Aug 24 i        i     i           i`* Re: Relativistic aberration3Python
12 Aug 24 i        i     i           i `* Re: Relativistic aberration2Maciej Wozniak
12 Aug 24 i        i     i           i  `- Re: Relativistic aberration1Python
12 Aug 24 i        i     i           `* Re: Relativistic aberration52gharnagel
12 Aug 24 i        i     i            `* Re: Relativistic aberration51Maciej Wozniak
12 Aug 24 i        i     i             +* Re: Relativistic aberration3Python
12 Aug 24 i        i     i             i`* Re: Relativistic aberration2Maciej Wozniak
12 Aug 24 i        i     i             i `- Re: Relativistic aberration1Python
12 Aug 24 i        i     i             `* Re: Relativistic aberration47gharnagel
12 Aug 24 i        i     i              +* Re: Relativistic aberration43Maciej Wozniak
13 Aug 24 i        i     i              i`* Re: Relativistic aberration42gharnagel
13 Aug 24 i        i     i              i +* Re: Relativistic aberration40Python
13 Aug 24 i        i     i              i i+* Re: Relativistic aberration13Ross Finlayson
13 Aug 24 i        i     i              i ii+* Re: Relativistic aberration11Python
13 Aug 24 i        i     i              i iii`* Re: Relativistic aberration10Ross Finlayson
13 Aug 24 i        i     i              i iii `* Re: Relativistic aberration9Python
13 Aug 24 i        i     i              i iii  `* Re: Relativistic aberration8Ross Finlayson
13 Aug 24 i        i     i              i iii   +- Re: Relativistic aberration1Python
13 Aug 24 i        i     i              i iii   `* Re: Relativistic aberration6Javis Orbán
14 Aug 24 i        i     i              i iii    `* Re: Relativistic aberration5Thomas Heger
14 Aug 24 i        i     i              i iii     +* Re: Relativistic aberration2Athel Cornish-Bowden
14 Aug 24 i        i     i              i iii     i`- Re: Relativistic aberration1Balabaanoff Bibitinsky
14 Aug 24 i        i     i              i iii     `* Re: Relativistic aberration2Python
15 Aug 24 i        i     i              i iii      `- Re: Relativistic aberration1Thomas Heger
13 Aug 24 i        i     i              i ii`- Re: Relativistic aberration1Mozhar Bairamkulov
13 Aug 24 i        i     i              i i`* Re: Relativistic aberration26gharnagel
13 Aug 24 i        i     i              i i `* Re: Relativistic aberration25Python
13 Aug 24 i        i     i              i i  `* Re: Relativistic aberration24gharnagel
13 Aug 24 i        i     i              i i   `* Re: Relativistic aberration23Python
13 Aug 24 i        i     i              i i    `* Re: Relativistic aberration22gharnagel
13 Aug 24 i        i     i              i i     `* Re: Relativistic aberration21Richard Hachel
13 Aug 24 i        i     i              i i      +* Re: Relativistic aberration5gharnagel
13 Aug 24 i        i     i              i i      i+* Re: Relativistic aberration2Richard Hachel
14 Aug 24 i        i     i              i i      ii`- Re: Relativistic aberration1gharnagel
13 Aug 24 i        i     i              i i      i`* Re: Relativistic aberration2Richard Hachel
14 Aug 24 i        i     i              i i      i `- Re: Relativistic aberration1Ross Finlayson
13 Aug 24 i        i     i              i i      +* Re: Relativistic aberration13Paul.B.Andersen
14 Aug 24 i        i     i              i i      i`* Re: Relativistic aberration12Python
14 Aug 24 i        i     i              i i      i `* His passion is to persecute scapegoats, but he fears evidences...11JC_Lavau
14 Aug 24 i        i     i              i i      i  +* "Persecution" is the desperate cry of cranks being confronted with facts8Python
14 Aug 24 i        i     i              i i      i  i+* Re: "Persecution" is the desperate cry of cranks being confronted with facts2Python
14 Aug 24 i        i     i              i i      i  ii`- Re: "Persecution" is the desperate cry of cranks being confronted with facts1Richard Hachel
14 Aug 24 i        i     i              i i      i  i`* Re: "Persecution" is the desperate cry of cranks being confronted with facts5Richard Hachel
14 Aug 24 i        i     i              i i      i  i `* Re: "Persecution" is the desperate cry of cranks being confronted with facts4Python
14 Aug 24 i        i     i              i i      i  i  +* Re: "Persecution" is the desperate cry of cranks being confronted with facts2Richard Hachel
14 Aug 24 i        i     i              i i      i  i  i`- Re: "Persecution" is the desperate cry of cranks being confronted with facts1Python
15 Aug 24 i        i     i              i i      i  i  `- Re: "Persecution" is the desperate cry of cranks being confronted with facts1Athel Cornish-Bowden
14 Aug 24 i        i     i              i i      i  +- Re: His passion is to persecute scapegoats, but he fears evidences...1Richard Hachel
14 Aug 24 i        i     i              i i      i  `- Re: His passion is to persecute scapegoats, but he fears evidences...1Richard Hachel
14 Aug 24 i        i     i              i i      +- Re: Relativistic aberration1Python
15 Aug 24 i        i     i              i i      `- Re: Relativistic aberration1Thomas Heger
13 Aug 24 i        i     i              i `- Re: Relativistic aberration1Maciej Wozniak
12 Aug 24 i        i     i              `* Re: Relativistic aberration3Josh Vassilopulos
12 Aug 24 i        i     i               `* Re: Relativistic aberration2Python
12 Aug 24 i        i     i                `- Re: Relativistic aberration1Pete Beaulieu
18 Jul 24 i        i     `* Re: Relativistic aberration7Thomas Heger
18 Jul 24 i        i      `* Re: Relativistic aberration6gharnagel
15 Jul 24 i        `- Re: Relativistic aberration1Richard Hachel
31 Jul 24 +* Re: Relativistic aberration69Sylvia Else
7 Aug 24 `* Re: Relativistic aberration37JanPB

Haut de la page

Les messages affichés proviennent d'usenet.

NewsPortal