Re: "Time" vs "physical time"

Le 08/08/2024 à 20:10, Maciej Wozniak a écrit :

W dniu 08.08.2024 o 19:16, Paul.B.Andersen pisze:
 

I can understand why you find it very hard to answer
questions when they are taken from practical scenarios
in the real world

 Your fellow idiot Mikko would tell you, poor halfbrain:
selling fantasy as reality is wqrong. And it is.

Maciej, you are right, selling fantasy or abstraction for reality is not good.
But insulting for free is not good either.
Paul B Andersen is a very good poster, and he has made many web pages dealing with relativity. He has made some mistakes, but it is not impossible to make him know the real nature of things, and not the many mistakes of relativistic physicists dictated by Einstein, Minkowski or others.
We should not insult him, but only show him where he makes mistakes, as for example when he integrates all the segments of an abstract curve, when he calculates the proper times of accelerated objects, and observable velocities of these same objects, or when he thinks he can draw a rotating relativistic disk on a simple piece of paper without understanding what the Lorentz transformations imply (i.e. an associated contraction of the radius).
For your part, I invite you to read and understand everything I say about RR and why I say it.
R.H.