Sujet : Re: "Time" vs "physical time"
De : me (at) *nospam* yahoo.com (Athel Cornish-Bowden)
Groupes : sci.physics.relativityDate : 09. Aug 2024, 10:42:02
Autres entêtes
Message-ID : <lhm32qFanqbU1@mid.individual.net>
References : 1 2 3 4 5 6
User-Agent : Unison/2.2
On 2024-08-08 20:36:48 +0000, J. J. Lodder said:
Richard Hachel <r.hachel@jesauspu.fr> wrote:
Le 08/08/2024 à 21:18, nospam@de-ster.demon.nl (J. J. Lodder) a écrit :
Does your peculiar physics predict a measured speed of c
for the highly relativistic neutrinos,
and if not, what else?
Your lack of knowledge in Hachelian physics is once again apparent.
Indeed, quite. Only Hachel knows about Hachelian physics.
True. Only "Dr" Hachel knows about Hachelian fantasies.
Do you honestly believe that I am going to answer you with anything other
than what I have already said?
So say it again. Does Hachelian physics predict an observed speed of c
for relativistic neutrinos traveling the 732 km from CERN to Gran Sasso?
(with the clocks at CERN and Gran Sasso synchronised by GPS)
Yes or no will do,
Jan
-- athel -- biochemist, not a physicist, but detector of crackpots
"Time" vs "physical time"
Re: "Time" vs "physical time"