Re: Relativistic aberration

On 08/11/2024 07:42 PM, gharnagel wrote:

On Sun, 11 Aug 2024 20:49:45 +0000, Python wrote:

>
Le 11/08/2024 à 22:39, Ross Finlayson a écrit :

>
On 08/11/2024 01:35 PM, Ross Finlayson wrote:

>
....
This isn't so different, yet, with a fuller dialectical
account of a deconstructive account and real continuum mechanics,
makes a better theory that isn't just broken by all the
missing impetus of supposed luminous matter and energy
in the entire cosmological survey, as that's thoroughly broken,
according to conscientious science.
>
Allais effect, ....

>
Cf. "Modern Tests of Relativistic Gravitational Theories"
>
https://www.google.com/search?q=Pound%20Rebka%20%22rubidium%22

>
Your post makes absolutely no sense from start to finish...
>
You are a bot, right?

>
Perhaps not.  A friend of mine told about a person where he worked
who spouted technical words, each of which sounded like he knew
what he was talking about, but when put together ... made absolutely
no sense.

fall-gravity = unifies gravity with strong nuclear force
space-contraction = keeps time-dilation and length-contraction conformal
continuum-mechanics = what quantum-mechanics is supposed to be
If you read Einstein's "Out of My Later Years" he has a lot to say
about why, for example,
SR is local in its "spacial" and GR is "spatial",
and linear and rotational are different.
If you can't read between these lines perhaps you should practice.