Re: Space-time interval (2)

Le 14/08/2024 à 15:08, Python a écrit :

 Clocks are physical devices (except in Wozniak's mind). They are not
synchronized by imaginary devices on imaginary spatial dimensions.
 They are built in order to have the same rate (inside an acceptable
narrow interval) to begin with, then drifted according to what
General Relativity predict in order to stay in synch in ECI
frame (despite what demented Wozniak pretends).
 These are engineering tasks, not the stupid mythomaniac fantasies of
a histrionic senile country doctor.

But you're mixing everything up.
That's not what I'm talking about, I'm talking about the initial synchronization. At some point you have to synchronize all the watches in all the capitals with each other.
However, this is by nature impossible.
The notion of universal anisochrony means that each watch will lag behind the other with an anisochrony Et=x/c, a reciprocal phenomenon that will affect all the watches in the universe.
So, to start the watches at t=0, you'll need a point in the universe placed at an equal distance from all the others, and only an abstract point placed in an imaginary, perpendicular dimension, at an equal distance from all the points in the local universe will be able to do this.
It's not hard to understand.
Now you are talking about something else, that is to say the second particularity which is no longer anisochrony, but the relativity of the internal chronotropy of watches, in the sense that time passes less quickly at the level of the satellite than at the level of a terrestrial clock, and that the chronotropic shift must be regularly reestablished.
R.H.