Sujet : Re: Space-time interval (2)
De : mlwozniak (at) *nospam* wp.pl (Maciej Wozniak)
Groupes : sci.physics.relativityDate : 15. Aug 2024, 18:46:42
Autres entêtes
Organisation : NewsDemon - www.newsdemon.com
Message-ID : <17ebf809b1e2d5f8$304257$558427$c2065a8b@news.newsdemon.com>
References : 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16
User-Agent : Mozilla Thunderbird
W dniu 15.08.2024 o 18:26, Python pisze:
Le 15/08/2024 à 18:04, Maciej Wozniak a écrit :
W dniu 15.08.2024 o 17:37, Python pisze:
Le 15/08/2024 à 17:31, Maciej Wozniak a écrit :
W dniu 15.08.2024 o 15:02, gharnagel pisze:
On Thu, 15 Aug 2024 12:10:55 +0000, Richard Hachel wrote:
>
But now that we have a synchronization based on M and validated
for M, we can make A and B beep simultaneously, and M will always
receive the beeps simultaneously. This is the universal present
for M. But ONLY for M.
>
Breathe, blow, yourself, Richard.
>
If I place myself at A, A will look at B with astonishment, and
will say B is out of tune, the present moment with which he beeps,
reaches me late, or rather EXISTS for me late. He beeps in my
future, and not at my present moment, because when I beep, his
beep does not exist FOR me, it will only exist in t=AB/c.
>
Breathe, blow, Richard. Scientists and engineers are smarter than
>
Engineers are for sure, and anyone can check
GPS, t'=t.
>
"My explosion engine does not explode! Pay me back!" - Wozniak at
the local car seller.
>
See, poor stinker - I've proven ...
Sure. You've also proven that Earth is flat.
slander
noun [ C or U ]
uk /ˈslɑːn.dər/ us /ˈslæn.dɚ/
a false spoken statement about someone that damages their reputation, or the making of such a statement:
Space-time interval (2)
Re: Space-time interval (2)