Re: Sync two clocks

W dniu 16.08.2024 o 13:05, Python pisze:

Le 16/08/2024 à 12:56, Maciej Wozniak a écrit :

W dniu 16.08.2024 o 12:47, Python pisze:

Le 15/08/2024 à 21:38, M.D. Richard "Hachel" Lengrand a écrit :

>
The notion of universal anisochrony means that each watch will lag behind the other with an anisochrony Et=x/c, a reciprocal phenomenon that will affect all the watches in the universe.
>

How naive is it possible to be?

>

You don't sync two clocks to each other, you sync one clock

to another clock.
>
You still don't understand.

>
You completely messed up your quotes above. Anyway...
>
You're probably a bit intellectually challenged to understand a
procedure that is fairly simple, just as you were in 2007 when you
miserably demonstrated it back then:
>
https://groups.google.com/g/fr.sci.physique/c/KgqI9gqTkR8/m/oMc9X0XjCWMJ
>
If the meaning of t_A, t_B, and t'_A are still unknown to you, you can
refer to Einstein 1905 article.
>
t_A is the time shown by clock A when a light signal is emitted;
>
t_B is the time shown by clock B when the signal is received and re-emitted;
>
t'_A is the time shown by clock A when the returned signal is received.
>
Given that your stubbornness in not wanting to understand what you don't
get at the first reading is even stronger than your stupidity (which is
saying something!), I doubt you'll even try to comprehend. However, here
are a few intermediate exercises to help you understand what most people
grasp on the first try:
>
1. Using the hypothesis (confirmed by experiment) that:

>
A lie,[snip whining]  -
the hypothesis was no way confirmed.

 A Review of One-Way and Two-Way Experiments to Test the Isotropy of the Speed of Light
 Md. Farid Ahmed, Brendan M. Quine, Stoyan Sargoytchev, A. D. Stauffer
 https://arxiv.org/abs/1011.1318

I could as well write those  experiments
are testing and confirming the advantage
of communism over rotten capitalism. But
they don't.

 

 But it was a self-denying absurd instead.

 Because you say so?

Because that's a VERY simple consequence
of a definition, in the time you're talking
about - in the time when your idiot guru
lived and mumbled - valid also for his
moronic church.
Unfortunately there is nothing absurd into light

speed two-way experiments to confirm it to be invariant.

Oh, yes, it is. You're an idiot, so
you're unable to notice.