Re: [SR and synchronization] Cognitive Dissonances and Mental Blockage

Le 19/08/2024 à 14:14, Maciej Wozniak a écrit :

W dniu 19.08.2024 o 12:57, Python pisze:

Le 19/08/2024 à 12:28, Maciej Wozniak a écrit :

W dniu 19.08.2024 o 12:18, Python pisze:

Le 18/08/2024 à 17:24, Maciej Wozniak a écrit :

W dniu 18.08.2024 o 17:08, Volney pisze:

On 8/17/2024 8:56 AM, Maciej Wozniak wrote:

W dniu 17.08.2024 o 14:52, Python pisze:

**An Interesting Case of Mental Blockage and Cognitive Dissonance:**
>
*Einstein-Poincaré Synchronization Procedure and Dr. Lengrand*
>
What’s fascinating about certain cranks is that just when you think you’ve seen all the absurdities they can come up with, they manage to produce something even worse. Their cognitive dissonance and ability to pull out bizarre notions from who knows where, on top of a perfectly well-defined technical procedure, is astonishing. We’ve seen this before with GPS, where Hachel invents all sorts of fantasies, like atomic clocks in the receivers or synchronization with a clock infinitely far away in a fourth spatial dimension...
>
This is a report of exchanges on the synchronization procedure described by Einstein in his 1905 paper, discussions that took place 17 years ago and more recently on sci.physics.relativity and fr.sci.physique.
>
https://groups.google.com/g/fr.sci.physique/c/KgqI9gqTkR8/m/oMc9X0XjCWMJ
>
*Reminders on the Procedure:*
>
Two identical clocks, A and B, are stationary relative to each other at a certain distance. Their identical functioning (within measurement accuracy)

>
>
Taking 2 identical pendulum clocks blows
this pathetic bullshit out.
>

Wrong. Two identical pendulum clocks, one on Earth, one on the moon, wouldn't even be close to functioning identically.

>
>
Indeed, stupid Mike, and that's why Python's
"Their identical functioning (within
measurement accuracy)" is just some delusion
of a fanatic idiot.

>
Oh, it was a "nothing goes" day for Maciej Wozniak yesterday :-)

>
No [snip slander]

>
Are you that delusional that you cannot realize that pretending
that building and putting at different places two clocks with "identical
functioning (within measurement accuracy)" is impossible is *weird*?
>
Seriously Wozniak?

 No, neither seriously nor any other way.
Just another slander of yours.
Still, your "logic" of
"identical clocks"=>"identical functioning
(within measurement accuracy)" is kind of
absurd. Like most of your "logic".

“Insanity is doing the same thing over and over and expecting different
results.” That witticism — I'll call it “Einstein Insanity” — is usually
attributed to Albert Einstein.
He wrote about you, after all :-)