Sujet : Re: Who?
De : mlwozniak (at) *nospam* wp.pl (Maciej Wozniak)
Groupes : sci.physics.relativityDate : 25. Aug 2024, 20:28:31
Autres entêtes
Organisation : NewsDemon - www.newsdemon.com
Message-ID : <17ef0f6595fa7a25$550813$505064$c2265aab@news.newsdemon.com>
References : 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8
User-Agent : Mozilla Thunderbird
W dniu 25.08.2024 o 21:06, gharnagel pisze:
On Sun, 25 Aug 2024 18:48:26 +0000, Maciej Wozniak wrote:
>
W dniu 25.08.2024 o 20:22, Paul.B.Andersen pisze:
>
Den 25.08.2024 14:34, skrev Richard Hachel:
>
Le 25/08/2024 à 13:47, "Paul.B.Andersen" a écrit :
>
You do understand that you can't make the lunar clock
change its reading by looking at it, don't you?
Or don't you?
>
Of course, I can't change lunar time by looking at it.
>
You have to be remarkable stupid if you don't understand that
the proper time shown by a clock won't change by being looked at.
>
Sure, sure, particularly when it is only
shown in some gedanken delusions of
some lunatic idiots.
Exactly, when Wozniak shows his gedanken delusion about 99766
and 86400, which is soundly refuted by all experimental evidence.
The physics of your idiot guru is not mine,
it's his.
Still, of course; as it gave inconsistent,
denying each other predictions - the
experimantal "evidence" simply had to
refute at least one of them.
I still wonder if you're going to be
impudent enough to claim directly:
"it had no definition of second". Are
you, trash?