Re: A short proof of the inconsistency of The Shit

W dniu 25.08.2024 o 22:54, Python pisze:

Le 25/08/2024 à 17:38, Maciej Wozniak a écrit :
...

So, the physics of your idiot guru had no definition
of second? Will you be impudent enough for such
an absurd lie, trash?

 Some part of physics may need a definition of second,
some other parts don't. Relativity (or Newtonian physics)
doesn't.

If you're  asserting, it must be true...
But how did they make  measurements
"confirming" your beloved relativity
without units?
Oh, I know. They didn't measure anything.
Instead they read a lot of tales about
some twins doing it... Right?