Sujet : Re: A short proof of the inconsistency of The Shit
De : hitlong (at) *nospam* yahoo.com (gharnagel)
Groupes : sci.physics.relativityDate : 28. Aug 2024, 05:08:36
Autres entêtes
Organisation : novaBBS
Message-ID : <817e448dd1bfaf851931f83a4aaae721@www.novabbs.com>
References : 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11
User-Agent : Rocksolid Light
On Tue, 27 Aug 2024 15:15:47 +0000, Richard Hachel wrote:
>
Le 27/08/2024 à 16:51, Maciej Wozniak a écrit :
>
No clocks were ever accelerated in any accelerator.
It's an impudent lie believable only by fanatic idiots.
This is another of Wozniak's multitudinous prevarications.
He tacitly accepts atomic clocks when he asserts his false
GPS t' = t baloney (t' is the time kept by the satellite
clock which is NOT t by design). Atomic clocks keep time
by Cs-133 atoms, so atoms are clocks. Atoms have been
accelerated in accelerators, so Wozniak is demonstrably
wrong.
Anyway, your pathetic lies of zillions of
experiments allegedly confirming the pathetic
mumble of your idiot guru are completely irrelevant
for this thread.
Nope, Wozniak is doubly lying again: (1) Only a demented
fool or a congenital liar would deny the overwhelming
evidence for SR and (2) SR cannot be irrelevant for this
thread where the OP was about what SR predicts for an
observer moving at c/2. Not only is Wozniak lying, his
lies are totally outrageous to the point of insanity.
The thread is about the inconsistent assumptions
of his physics and inconsistent conclusions
derivable from it. You're too dumb to understand
even that, but still it is.
>
That's right, you're absolutely right, and no clock has
ever been placed in accelerators.
Richard, Richard, Richard! You're drinking the kool ade
of one who is demonstrably non compos mentis.
Which presents a huge experimental problem.
No, it presents a mental problem of a magnitude presented
in the movie, "They Might Be Giants." Wozniak is Justin
Playfair and YOU are Dr. Watson. You've been taken in,
just like Watson was.
https://psychcentral.com/blog/grandiosity-and-delusion-grandeur#definitionboast about real or exaggerated accomplishments
consider yourself more talented or intelligent than others
dismiss or try to one-up the achievements of others
believe you don’t need anyone else to succeed
believe you’re above rules or ordinary limits
fail to recognize that your actions could harm others
lash out in anger when someone criticizes you or points out
a flaw in your plans
These points seem to describe Wozniak very well, and you
are following in his footsteps.