Re: A short proof of the inconsistency of The Shit

On Wed, 28 Aug 2024 5:42:04 +0000, Maciej Wozniak wrote:

>
W dniu 28.08.2024 o 06:08, gharnagel pisze:

>
Le 27/08/2024 à 16:51, Maciej Wozniak a écrit :

>
No clocks were ever accelerated in any accelerator.
It's an impudent lie believable only by fanatic idiots.

>
This is another of Wozniak's multitudinous prevarications.
He tacitly accepts atomic clocks when he asserts his false
GPS t' = t baloney (t' is the time kept by the satellite
clock which is NOT t by design).  Atomic clocks keep time
by Cs-133 atoms, so atoms are clocks.

>
No they are not, you simply don't know
what a clock is, just like most (if not
all) of relativistic idiots.
https://www.istockphoto.com/pl/search/2/image-film?phrase=clock

Wozniak lacks sufficient vision and is woefully ignorant of
the information he worships:
https://www.britannica.com/technology/atomic-clock
"Atomic clock, type of clock that uses certain resonance
frequencies of atoms (usually cesium or rubidium) to keep
time with extreme accuracy.
So Wozniak is either an ignoramus or a congenital liar.
Not totally his fault.  His parents should have washed
L'il Wozzie's mouth out with soap much more often.

And - anyone can check GPS, or TAI, or UTC
-  atomic clocks don't keep "time by
Cs-133 atom",  they keep something else.

Wozzie keeps something else: it's called lying.

Anyway, your pathetic lies of zillions of
experiments allegedly confirming the pathetic
mumble of your idiot guru are completely irrelevant
for this thread.

>
Nope, Wozniak is doubly lying again: (1) Only a demented
fool or a congenital liar would deny the overwhelming
evidence for SR

>
Or rather, any relativistic doggie will spit
at anyone not kneeling before his beloved
idiocies with all its might.

Woxniak is projecting his own despicable behavior as he
insults and slanders his way through his so-called life.

 and (2) SR cannot be irrelevant for this thread

But the experiments allegedly confirming The Shit are.

L'il Wozzie is lying again.  It's easy to discern since
he deleted the rest of the argument:

where the OP was about what SR predicts for an
observer moving at c/2.

So experiments are the sine qua non of the validity of
any theory, including relativity.  L'il Wozzie's denial
of the copious experimental evidence is a sign of mental
derangement.
https://www.psychalive.org/denial-the-danger-in-rejecting-reality/
"I’m in my bubble, and nothing like that happens here."

The thread is about its inconsistent assumptions and
inconsistent conclusions derivable from them.

So L'il Wozzie can conclude assumptions are inconsistent
without examining them?  Which assumptions are those?
What experiments support them?  What conclusions are
drawn from them that are "inconsistent"?

Your precious  experiments are irrelevant here.

Says the congenital liar.

No, it presents a mental problem of a magnitude presented
in the movie, "They Might Be Giants."  Wozniak is Justin
Playfair and Hachel are Dr. Watson.  Hachel has been taken
in, just like Watson was.
>
>

https://psychcentral.com/blog/grandiosity-and-delusion-grandeur#definition

>
boast about real or exaggerated accomplishments
consider yourself more talented or intelligent than others
dismiss or try to one-up the achievements of others

Wozzie deleted a dangerous effect of delusions of grandeur:

fail to recognize that your actions could harm others

And Wozzie's delusional behavior has obviously harmed Hachel.

Like - pretending that GPS clock are not real,

No one is saying that.  They are set so they will appear
correct on earth, which means they were set to run slow
before launch.  And just because a clock doesn't keep
the correct time doesn't mean it's unreal.  People set
their clocks ahead so they won't be late.  Wossie is
lying again.

as they don't match one's sick delusions of "reality".

Says the congenital liar and reality denier.