Re: A short proof of the inconsistency of [SR]

Le 30/08/2024 à 16:28, Maciej Wozniak a écrit :

W dniu 30.08.2024 o 16:00, Python pisze:

Le 30/08/2024 à 15:57, Maciej Wozniak a écrit :

[boring nonsense]

>
Maciej, did it come to your mind that your "argument" for the
inconsistency of SR is soooo damned simple that if it were
sound it would have been pointed out for ages by other people
than you? If not by scientists (i.e. for you "member of the
cult"), by other relativity deniers.

 Well, it is  so damned simple and it wasn't pointed
out, [...] - so your "logic is as worthless
as always.

This is not worthless logic.
Let's define:
P:"The argument is damned simple"
Q:"The argument is sound"
R:"It has been pointed out before Maciej Wozniak enlightment"
P is true
(P and Q) => R is extremely and strongly plausible: 99.99999%
Would you admit it?
You admit that P and (not R) is true.
My claim is that Q is false and that the plausibility is
a strong argument for that (among many many others that
does not rely on "plausibility" but hard facts).