Liste des Groupes | Revenir à sp relativity |
Am Freitag000030, 30.08.2024 um 12:16 schrieb Python:This. is. a. plain. LIE.Le 30/08/2024 à 07:53, Thomas Heger a écrit :This 'relativity of simultaneity' is based on observations by an observer in the middle between A and B.Am Donnerstag000029, 29.08.2024 um 10:57 schrieb Python:...>>But Einstein, however, had not written about a symmetric system of clock synchronization.>
Liar!
>
« We assume that this definition of synchronism is free from contradictions, and possible for any number of points; and that the following relations are universally valid:
>
1. *If the clock at B synchronizes with the clock at A, the clock at A synchronizes with the clock at B*.
>
2. If the clock at A synchronizes with the clock at B and also with the clock at C, the clocks at B and C also synchronize with each other.
»
>
What is point 1. if not *symmetry*?
See here for instance:
>
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=nCGuhcrb-qM
>
This is a video in German about Einstein's simultaneity , but you will certainly find something equivalent in English.
>
The trick of Einstein's method was an extra-observer in the middle between the two ends of a longish train.
>
Now this system would not require to correct the delay 'by hand'.
>
And this method was apparently meant by Einstein himself.
This video is in NO WAY describing a synchronization procedure ! It
actually assumes that clocks (both on train and platform) has been
synchronized. This video is illustrating the relativity of simultaneity.
So, Einstein used this setting and related time the observations of an observer in the middle.
Les messages affichés proviennent d'usenet.