Re: [SR and synchronization] Cognitive Dissonances and Mental Blockage

W dniu 31.08.2024 o 15:22, Python pisze:

Le 31/08/2024 à 15:05, Maciej Wozniak a écrit :

W dniu 31.08.2024 o 14:19, Python pisze:

Le 30/08/2024 à 20:03, Maciej Wozniak a écrit :

W dniu 30.08.2024 o 17:09, Python pisze:

Le 30/08/2024 à 13:44, Maciej Wozniak a écrit :
...

No theory of mathematics include clocks.

>
Sure! But a model of clocks can appear in a mathematical
theory.

>
It can

>
Good to know. We agree then.
>

and, what's more important - a
relativistic idiot like to invoke
the auyhority of mathematics for
excusing his mad claims.
BTW - is Pythagorean theorem a
"hard mathematical fact"?
Yes or not?

>
The hard mathematical fact is: Euclid's Axioms => Pythagorean theorem.
>
Another question?

>
Here it comes:
Quoting:
 >> Paragraph I.1. describes a procedure that looks non symmetric at
 >> first sight: clocks A and B are not treated exactly the same way
 >> (two measures for A, one for B for instance), nevertheless at the
 >> end of the day one can *prove* that the results are symmetric and
 >> that inverting A and B would lead to the same result.
 >
This is hard mathematical facts Richard. Something beyond your head.
End of quoting.
>
No axioms now implying that?

 We basically need a archimedian complete ordered field. i.e. R.
 Let's pick ZFC + Peano, and R (for values of the "clocks") defined as
the set of Cauchy sequences on Q or Dedekind's cuts.

I see: a cow and a cow gives a rhino.
What a hard mathematical fact it is -
just take Peano's and define a cow
as 1 and  a rhino as 2.